Literature DB >> 7892171

Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families.

B Rost1, C Sander.   

Abstract

Currently, the prediction of three-dimensional (3D) protein structure from sequence alone is an exceedingly difficult task. As an intermediate step, a much simpler task has been pursued extensively: predicting 1D strings of secondary structure. Here, we present an analysis of another 1D projection from 3D structure: the relative solvent accessibility of each residue. We show that solvent accessibility is less conserved in 3D homologues than is secondary structure, and hence is predicted less accurately from automatic homology modeling; the correlation coefficient of relative solvent accessibility between 3D homologues is only 0.77, and the average accuracy of predictions based on sequence alignments is only 0.68. The latter number provides an effective upper limit on the accuracy of predicting accessibility from sequence when homology modeling is not possible. We introduce a neural network system that predicts relative solvent accessibility (projected onto ten discrete states) using evolutionary profiles of amino acid substitutions derived from multiple sequence alignments. Evaluated in a cross-validation test on 238 unique proteins, the correlation between predicted and observed relative accessibility is 0.54. Interpreted in terms of a three-state (buried, intermediate, exposed) description of relative accessibility, the fraction of correctly predicted residue states is about 58%. In absolute terms this accuracy appears poor, but given the relatively low conservation of accessibility in 3D families, the network system is not far from its likely optimal performance. The most reliably predicted fraction of the residues (50%) is predicted as accurately as by automatic homology modeling. Prediction is best for buried residues, e.g., 86% of the completely buried sites are correctly predicted as having 0% relative accessibility.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7892171     DOI: 10.1002/prot.340200303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  162 in total

1.  An internal targeting signal directing proteins into the mitochondrial intermembrane space.

Authors:  K Diekert; G Kispal; B Guiard; R Lill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Characterisation of the structure of ocr, the gene 0.3 protein of bacteriophage T7.

Authors:  C Atanasiu; O Byron; H McMiken; S S Sturrock; D T Dryden
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The PredictProtein server.

Authors:  Burkhard Rost; Jinfeng Liu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The PredictProtein server.

Authors:  Burkhard Rost; Guy Yachdav; Jinfeng Liu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Sequence-based prediction of protein domains.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Evolution and comparative genomics of odorant- and pheromone-associated genes in rodents.

Authors:  Richard D Emes; Scott A Beatson; Chris P Ponting; Leo Goodstadt
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Abstractions, algorithms and data structures for structural bioinformatics in PyCogent.

Authors:  Marcin Cieślik; Zygmunt S Derewenda; Cameron Mura
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Identification of interface residues in protease-inhibitor and antigen-antibody complexes: a support vector machine approach.

Authors:  Changhui Yan; Vasant Honavar; Drena Dobbs
Journal:  Neural Comput Appl       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Fasciola hepatica: identification of CD4+ T-helper epitopes from the 11.5 kDa saposin-like protein SAP-2 using synthetic peptides.

Authors:  Ana M Espino; Daricel Torres; Adelaida Morales; Bonnibel Delgado; Julia Quetel; Antonio Osuna
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 2.011

10.  Comparative evolutionary genomics of androgen-binding protein genes.

Authors:  Richard D Emes; Matthew C Riley; Christina M Laukaitis; Leo Goodstadt; Robert C Karn; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.