Literature DB >> 2693020

Ultrasonic degradation of DNA.

H I Elsner1, E B Lindblad.   

Abstract

Different results are obtained when DNA in aqueous solution and DNA in biological tissue are exposed to ultrasound. At intensities of ultrasound comparable to those applied clinically, ultrasonication is able to degrade purified DNA in aqueous solution, making ultrasonication a useful tool for preparing DNA fragments in vitro. Ultrasonic degradation of DNA in solution occurs by breaking hydrogen bonds and by single-strand and double-strand ruptures of the DNA helix. Two mechanisms are mainly responsible: cavitation and a thermal or mechanical effect. Stable cavitation is seen at low intensities of ultrasound. Increasing the intensity of the ultrasound above 2 W/cm2 is followed by increases in single-strand ruptures due to the creation of free radicals by transient cavitation. Following sonication, the distribution of the resulting DNA fragments approaches a lower size limit of 100-500 bp. Breaks in the DNA helix occur mainly between oxygen and carbon atoms, resulting in DNA fragments with a phosphorylated 5' end and a free alcohol at the 3' end. The relative lack of specificity in degrading the DNA helix makes ultrasonication a complementary alternative to the highly specific fragmentation obtained by restriction endonucleases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2693020     DOI: 10.1089/dna.1989.8.697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA        ISSN: 0198-0238


  21 in total

1.  Amplifiable DNA from gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria by a low strength pulsed electric field method.

Authors:  F Vitzthum; G Geiger; H Bisswanger; B Elkine; H Brunner; J Bernhagen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  One-step acquisition of functional biomolecules from tissues.

Authors:  Sumit Paliwal; Makoto Ogura; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sequence-specific ultrasonic cleavage of DNA.

Authors:  Sergei L Grokhovsky; Irina A Il'icheva; Dmitry Yu Nechipurenko; Michail V Golovkin; Larisa A Panchenko; Robert V Polozov; Yury D Nechipurenko
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A DNA end-binding factor involved in double-strand break repair and V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  W K Rathmell; G Chu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Elucidating Protein-DNA Interactions in Human Alphoid Chromatin via Hybridization Capture and Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Katherine E Buxton; Julia Kennedy-Darling; Michael R Shortreed; Nur Zafirah Zaidan; Michael Olivier; Mark Scalf; Rupa Sridharan; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Discrete regions of the avian beta-globin gene cluster have tissue-specific hypersensitivity to cleavage by sonication in nuclei.

Authors:  J S Reneker; T W Brotherton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing method for polyplex synthesis.

Authors:  Mengqian Lu; Yi-Ping Ho; Christopher L Grigsby; Ahmad Ahsan Nawaz; Kam W Leong; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 8.  Intra-ChIP: studying gene regulation in an intracellular pathogen.

Authors:  Brett R Hanson; Ming Tan
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  Efficacy of reduced-size short tandem repeat PCR analysis for degraded DNA samples.

Authors:  Jeongyong Kim; Hyojeong Kim; Youn-Hyoung Nam; Ja Hyun Lee; Hyo Sook Kim; Eungsoo Kim
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.839

10.  Ultrasound-mediated DNA transformation in thermophilic gram-positive anaerobes.

Authors:  Lu Lin; Houhui Song; Yuetong Ji; Zhili He; Yunting Pu; Jizhong Zhou; Jian Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.