Literature DB >> 24217694

In vitro pharmacodynamics of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline and daptomycin against MRSA, hVISA, and VISA with and without prior vancomycin exposure.

Amira A Bhalodi1, Mao Hagihara, David P Nicolau, Joseph L Kuti.   

Abstract

The effects of prior vancomycin exposure on ceftaroline and daptomycin therapy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have not been widely studied. Humanized free-drug exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 12 h (q12h), ceftaroline at 600 mg q12h, and daptomycin at 10 mg/kg of body weight q24h were simulated in a 96-h in vitro pharmacodynamic model against three MRSA isolates, including one heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) isolate and one VISA isolate. A total of five regimens were tested: vancomycin, ceftaroline, and daptomycin alone for the entire 96 h, and then sequential therapy with vancomycin for 48 h followed by ceftaroline or daptomycin for 48 h. Microbiological responses were measured by the changes in log10 CFU during 96 h from baseline. Control isolates grew to 9.16 ± 0.32, 9.13 ± 0.14, and 8.69 ± 0.28 log10 CFU for MRSA, hVISA, and VISA, respectively. Vancomycin initially achieved ≥3 log10 CFU reductions against the MRSA and hVISA isolates, followed by regrowth beginning at 48 h; minimal activity was observed against VISA. The change in 96-h log10 CFU was largest for sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by ceftaroline (-5.22 ± 1.2, P = 0.010 versus ceftaroline) and for sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by ceftaroline (-3.60 ± 0.6, P = 0.037 versus daptomycin), compared with daptomycin (-2.24 ± 1.0), vancomycin (-1.40 ± 1.8), and sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by daptomycin (-1.32 ± 1.0, P > 0.5 for the last three regimens). Prior exposure of vancomycin at 1 g q12h reduced the initial microbiological response of daptomycin, particularly for hVISA and VISA isolates, but did not affect the response of ceftaroline. In the scenario of poor vancomycin response for high-inoculum MRSA infection, a ceftaroline-containing regimen may be preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24217694      PMCID: PMC3910832          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01516-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  33 in total

1.  Retrospective evaluation of therapies for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Authors:  C A Gentry; K A Rodvold; R M Novak; R C Hershow; O J Naderer
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  R L Akins; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Prediction model to identify patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia at risk for methicillin resistance.

Authors:  Thomas P Lodise; Peggy S McKinnon; Michael Rybak
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Multicenter evaluation of the clinical outcomes of daptomycin with and without concomitant β-lactams in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and mild to moderate renal impairment.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise; Maria Amodio-Groton; Mohamad Rashid; Kenneth C Lamp; Holly L Hoffman-Roberts; George Sakoulas; Min J Yoon; Suzanne Schweitzer; Anjay Rastogi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  A J Larsson; K J Walker; J K Raddatz; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Slow response to vancomycin or vancomycin plus rifampin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Authors:  D P Levine; B S Fromm; B R Reddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  In vitro pharmacodynamic effects of concentration, pH, and growth phase on serum bactericidal activities of daptomycin and vancomycin.

Authors:  K C Lamp; M J Rybak; E M Bailey; G W Kaatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Bactericidal activities of daptomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and linezolid against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Raymond Cha; William J Brown; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Vancomycin protein binding in patients with infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  L M Albrecht; M J Rybak; L H Warbasse; D J Edwards
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

10.  Influence of protein binding under controlled conditions on the bactericidal activity of daptomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Raymond Cha; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  8 in total

1.  Fosfomycin Enhances the Activity of Daptomycin against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model.

Authors:  Ashley D Hall Snyder; Brian J Werth; Poochit Nonejuie; John P McRoberts; Joe Pogliano; George Sakoulas; Juwon Yim; Nivedita Singh; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Human Simulated Exposures of Telavancin against Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with and without Prior Vancomycin Exposure.

Authors:  Abrar K Thabit; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of in vivo and in vitro pharmacodynamics of a humanized regimen of 600 milligrams of Ceftaroline Fosamil every 12 hours against Staphylococcus aureus at initial inocula of 106 and 108 CFU per milliliter.

Authors:  Wonhee So; Jared L Crandon; George G Zhanel; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Efficacy of Ceftaroline against Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Exhibiting the Cefazolin High-Inoculum Effect in a Rat Model of Endocarditis.

Authors:  Kavindra V Singh; Truc T Tran; Esteban C Nannini; Vincent H Tam; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Vancomycin against Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Considering the Variability in Observed Tissue Exposure.

Authors:  Yukihiro Hamada; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Daptomycin non-susceptible, vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis treated with ceftaroline and daptomycin: case report and brief review of the literature.

Authors:  Sanjiv M Baxi; Dominic Chan; Vivek Jain
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  In vitro activity of human-simulated epithelial lining fluid exposures of ceftaroline, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Shawn H MacVane; Wonhee So; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Treatment of Gram-positive infections in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Cristina Vazquez-Guillamet; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.090

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.