Literature DB >> 26621619

In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Vancomycin against Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Considering the Variability in Observed Tissue Exposure.

Yukihiro Hamada1, Joseph L Kuti2, David P Nicolau3.   

Abstract

Vancomycin is considered a first-line antibiotic for complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) because of the risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The vancomycin exposure of tissue can vary widely in patients with cSSSI, yet most models test only the average exposure. The in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate three tissue exposure levels attained by administering vancomycin at 1 g every 12 h (q12h), based on the median (50th), 25th, and 10th percentile tissue area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values observed during an in vivo microdialysis study of diabetic patients. Four clinical isolates (two of MRSA [vancomycin MIC, 1 and 2 μg/ml] and two of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] [MIC, 1 and 2 μg/ml]) were evaluated. Experiments were performed over 72 h in duplicate. Time-kill curves were constructed, and the area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curve (AUBC) during the final 24-h dosing interval (48 to 72 h) (AUBC48-72) was calculated. Reductions in the 72-h number of CFU/ml and AUBC48-72 at the different exposure levels were compared. Target tissue vancomycin exposure levels for the 50th (AUC0-12, 102.0 ± 9.1 μg · h/ml), 25th (AUC0-12, 44.3 ± 1.8 μg · h/ml), and 10th (AUC0-12, 25.3 ± 3.1 μg · h/ml) percentiles were obtained in all studies. No differences in the 72-h number of CFU or AUBC were observed between exposure levels when all of the isolates were analyzed together. However, for the two MRSA isolates, the 10th percentile exposure level achieved a lower 72-h number of CFU/ml (-1.4 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/ml, P = 0.007) and a greater AUBC48-72 (97.1 ± 20.0 log10 CFU · h/ml, P = 0.011) than the higher exposure levels. The majority of the tissue exposure levels achieved with a vancomycin dosing regimen of 1 g q12h resulted in substantial killing of MSSA and MRSA; however, the lowest exposure levels observed in a minority of the population may explain the poor vancomycin response.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26621619      PMCID: PMC4750711          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01553-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  33 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.

Authors:  Michael Rybak; Ben Lomaestro; John C Rotschafer; Robert Moellering; William Craig; Marianne Billeter; Joseph R Dalovisio; Donald P Levine
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Gregory J Moran; Anusha Krishnadasan; Rachel J Gorwitz; Gregory E Fosheim; Linda K McDougal; Roberta B Carey; David A Talan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The effect of diabetes and severe ischaemia on the penetration of ceftazidime into tissues of the limb.

Authors:  J T Raymakers; A J Houben; J J van der Heyden; J H Tordoir; P J Kitslaar; N C Schaper
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Impaired target site penetration of vancomycin in diabetic patients following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Keso Skhirtladze; Doris Hutschala; Tatjana Fleck; Florian Thalhammer; Marek Ehrlich; Thomas Vukovich; Markus Müller; Edda M Tschernko
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Staphylococcus aureus skin infection recurrences among household members: an examination of host, behavioral, and pathogen-level predictors.

Authors:  Loren G Miller; Samantha J Eells; Michael Z David; Nancy Ortiz; Alexis R Taylor; Neha Kumar; Denise Cruz; Susan Boyle-Vavra; Robert S Daum
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Impact of high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the activities of nafcillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Kerry L LaPlante; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  A J Larsson; K J Walker; J K Raddatz; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Epidemiology and outcomes of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  S L Davis; M B Perri; S M Donabedian; C Manierski; A Singh; D Vager; N Z Haque; K Speirs; R R Muder; B Robinson-Dunn; M K Hayden; M J Zervos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  In vivo microdialysis study of the penetration of daptomycin into soft tissues in diabetic versus healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Aryun Kim; Larry A Suecof; Christina A Sutherland; Lihong Gao; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Quantitative cultures of biopsy specimens from cutaneous cellulitis.

Authors:  T Duvanel; R Auckenthaler; P Rohner; M Harms; J H Saurat
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Vancomycin 24-Hour Area under the Curve/Minimum Bactericidal Concentration Ratio as a Novel Predictor of Mortality in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Nicholas S Britt; Nimish Patel; Rebecca T Horvat; Molly E Steed
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Predicting Antimicrobial Activity at the Target Site: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Indices versus Time-Kill Approaches.

Authors:  Wisse van Os; Markus Zeitlinger
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.