Literature DB >> 26482306

In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Human Simulated Exposures of Telavancin against Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with and without Prior Vancomycin Exposure.

Abrar K Thabit1, David P Nicolau2, Joseph L Kuti3.   

Abstract

Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with potent activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). The activity of telavancin against MRSA and MSSA after prior vancomycin exposure was studied in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Two clinical MRSA and two MSSA isolates, all with vancomycin MICs of 2 μg/ml, were subjected to humanized free drug exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 12 h (q12h) for 96 h, telavancin at 750 mg q24h for 96 h, and vancomycin at 1 g q12h for 72 h followed by telavancin at 750 mg q24h for 48 h (120 h total). The microbiological responses were measured by changes from 0 h in log10 CFU/ml at the end of experiments and area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curves over 96 h (AUBC0-96). The control isolates grew to 8.8 ± 0.3 log10 CFU/ml. Initially, all regimens caused -4.5 ± 0.9 reductions in log10 CFU/ml by 48 h followed by slight regrowth over the following 48 to 72 h. After 96 h, vancomycin and telavancin achieved -3.7 ± 0.9 and -3.8 ± 0.8 log10 CFU/ml changes from baseline, respectively (P = 0.74). Sequential exposure to telavancin after vancomycin did not result in additional CFU reductions or increases, with ultimate log10 CFU/ml reductions of -4.3 ± 1.1 at 96 h and -4.2 ± 1.3 at 120 h (P > 0.05 for all comparisons at 96 h). The AUBC0-96 was significantly smaller for the regimen of telavancin for 96 h than for the regimens of vancomycin for 96 h and vancomycin followed by telavancin (P ≤ 0.04). No resistance was observed throughout the experiment. Against these MRSA and MSSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of 2 μg/ml, telavancin was comparable with vancomycin and its activity was unaffected by prior vancomycin exposure.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26482306      PMCID: PMC4704209          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02033-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  34 in total

1.  Successful treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis with telavancin.

Authors:  Heather Nace; Bennett Lorber
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Comparative in vitro activity of telavancin, vancomycin and linezolid against heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA).

Authors:  Steven N Leonard; Yong G Szeto; Maria Zolotarev; Ilona V Grigoryan
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Are vancomycin trough concentrations adequate for optimal dosing?

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Gilmer Youn; Brenda Jones; Roger W Jelliffe; George L Drusano; Keith A Rodvold; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Impact of patient characteristics and infection type on clinical outcomes of patients who received linezolid or vancomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a pooled data analysis.

Authors:  Laura A Puzniak; Blair Capitano; Pinaki Biswas; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Comparative activity of the new lipoglycopeptide telavancin in the presence and absence of serum against 50 glycopeptide non-susceptible staphylococci and three vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kimberly D Leuthner; Chrissy M Cheung; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Vancomycin tolerance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: influence of vancomycin, daptomycin, and telavancin on differential resistance gene expression.

Authors:  Warren E Rose; Michael Fallon; John J M Moran; Joshua P Vanderloo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections associated with surgical procedures.

Authors:  Samuel E Wilson; William O'Riordan; Alan Hopkins; H David Friedland; Steven L Barriere; Michael M Kitt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Pharmacodynamic comparison of linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci collected from hospitals in Brazil.

Authors:  J L Kuti; C R V Kiffer; C M F Mendes; D P Nicolau
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Vancomycin protein binding in patients with infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  L M Albrecht; M J Rybak; L H Warbasse; D J Edwards
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity: grave concern or death by character assassination?

Authors:  Kathleen A Hazlewood; Sara D Brouse; William D Pitcher; Ronald G Hall
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Antibacterial activity of recently approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Sajad Rajabi; Chunhua Shi; Ghazale Afifirad; Nazanin Omidi; Ebrahim Kouhsari; Saeed Khoshnood; Khalil Azizian
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.781

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.