Literature DB >> 8937954

The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

A J Larsson1, K J Walker, J K Raddatz, J C Rotschafer.   

Abstract

An in-vitro pharmacodynamic system was used to generate time-kill curves to demonstrate the concentration-independent pharmacodynamics of vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213. Initial vancomycin concentrations of 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg/L were studied monoexponentially while simulating a 6 h half-life. One parallel experiment was performed in duplicate using an initial peak concentration of 40 mg/L where both a distribution alpha-phase half-life of 0.66 h for 1 h and an elimination beta-phase half-life of 6 h for 11 h were simulated to determine if the transient distribution phase concentrations of vancomycin have any impact on bacterial killing beyond that provided by the elimination phase concentrations. Additionally, two monoexponential experiments with peak concentrations of 40 and 20 mg/L and a half-life of 6 h were repeated in an anaerobic chamber to determine if killing of S. aureus was affected. The time to achieve a 3 log10 kill was calculated from the linear portion of the regression line and averaged (mean +/- S.D.) 9.0 +/- 1.4 h for all aerobic monoexponential experiments and was 8.4 and 8.6 h for the aerobic biexponential experiments (P > 0.05). For the anaerobic studies, the times to reach 3 log10 kill were significantly greater averaging 18.9 +/- 1.7 h. The slopes of the bacterial kill curves were virtually identical for both monoexponential and biexponential aerobic experiments averaging -0.34 +/- 0.04, yet significantly different from the anaerobic bacterial kill curve slopes of -0.16 +/- 0.015 (P < 0.05). Time-kill curve analyses suggest that varying the concentration of vancomycin does not affect the rate or extent of bacterial killing aerobically or anaerobically against S. aureus and more efficient killing was achieved under aerobic conditions. The simulated distribution phase concentrations did not contribute to more effective killing of this strain of S. aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8937954     DOI: 10.1093/jac/38.4.589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  27 in total

Review 1.  Telavancin: a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide agent to counter the challenge of resistant Gram-positive pathogens.

Authors:  Biswadeep Das; Chayna Sarkar; Debasmita Das; Amit Gupta; Arnav Kalra; Shubham Sahni
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-08

2.  Antibacterial action of polyphosphate on Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Authors:  Ji-Hoi Moon; Jae-Hong Park; Jin-Yong Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Predicting in vitro antibacterial efficacy across experimental designs with a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Elisabet I Nielsen; Otto Cars; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Describing Assay Precision-Reciprocal of Variance Is Correct, Not CV Percent: Its Use Should Significantly Improve Laboratory Performance.

Authors:  Roger W Jelliffe; Alan Schumitzky; David Bayard; Xiaowei Fu; Michael Neely
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Appropriate antibiotic dosage levels in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Maya Hites; Marjorie Beumier; Sabino Scolletta; Frédérique Jacobs
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Prospective Trial on the Use of Trough Concentration versus Area under the Curve To Determine Therapeutic Vancomycin Dosing.

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Lauren Kato; Gilmer Youn; Lironn Kraler; David Bayard; Michael van Guilder; Alan Schumitzky; Walter Yamada; Brenda Jones; Emi Minejima
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Antibacterial dosing in intensive care: pharmacokinetics, degree of disease and pharmacodynamics of sepsis.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline and daptomycin against MRSA, hVISA, and VISA with and without prior vancomycin exposure.

Authors:  Amira A Bhalodi; Mao Hagihara; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Selecting antibacterials for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy : pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Richard S Slavik; Peter J Jewesson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.