Literature DB >> 1486199

Effects of long-term bilateral and unilateral fitting of different hearing aid types on the ability to locate sounds.

D Byrne1, W Noble, B LePage.   

Abstract

Aided localization ability of 87 hearing-impaired listeners was tested for horizontal and vertical sound sources, at two signal levels, and for two orientations to the loudspeaker array (facing, sideways). Some listeners wore behind-the-ear (BTE) aids, others in-the-ear (ITE) aids. Some were bilaterally fitted, others unilaterally fitted. Listeners were tested only with types of aids and fittings that they were accustomed to wearing. The results strongly supported bilateral fitting for moderately and severely hearing-impaired listeners. However, for mildly impaired listeners, those fitted unilaterally performed as well, on average, as those fitted bilaterally. This suggests a need to consider individual listening requirements and also to provide such listeners with experience in unilaterally-aided listening before assessing the possible advantages of bilateral fitting. When hearing level was controlled, there was no overall difference in the performance of ITE and BTE aid wearers. This discrepancy with other research may be explained by measures (removal of intensity cues, permitting of head movement) designed to make the test situation more representative of real-life listening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1486199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  16 in total

1.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

3.  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.

Authors:  Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

5.  Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Ruth A Litovsky; Michael J Strube; Francis Kuk
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10

7.  An attempt to improve bilateral cochlear implants by increasing the distance between electrodes and providing complementary information to the two ears.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt; Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Aaron J Parkinson; Blake S Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 8.  Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.

Authors:  Helen J Simon; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

9.  Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12

10.  The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.