Literature DB >> 20515424

A comparison of CIC and BTE hearing aids for three-dimensional localization of speech.

Virginia Best1, Sridhar Kalluri, Sara McLachlan, Susie Valentine, Brent Edwards, Simon Carlile.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional sound localization of speech in anechoic space was examined for eleven listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. The listeners were fitted bilaterally with CIC and BTE hearing aids having similar bandwidth capabilities. The goal was to determine whether differences in microphone placement for these two styles (CICs at the ear canal entrance; BTEs above the pinna) would influence the availability of pinna-related spectral cues and hence localization performance. While lateral and polar angle localization was unaffected by the hearing aid style, the rate of front-back reversals was lower with CICs. This pattern persisted after listeners accommodated to each set of aids for a six week period, although the overall rate of reversals declined. Performance on all measures in all conditions was considerably poorer than in a control group of listeners with normal hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515424     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.484827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  16 in total

1.  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life III: Localization.

Authors:  Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jorge Mejia; Katrina Freeston; Richard J van Hoesel; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Head Movements Allow Listeners Bilaterally Implanted With Cochlear Implants to Resolve Front-Back Confusions.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Sarah J Natale; William A Yost; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of Hearing Loss on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity at Low and High Frequencies.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Lucas S Baltzell; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

5.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10

6.  Speech detection and localization in a reverberant multitalker environment by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jörg M Buchholz; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Effects of Spatial Training Paradigms on Auditory Spatial Refinement in Normal-Hearing Listeners: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha; Ajith Uppunda Kumar
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2022-02-24

10.  Spatial hearing and hearing aids.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; William M Whitmer
Journal:  ENT Audiol News       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.