Literature DB >> 11730198

Preserving central blood volume: changes in body fluid compartments during hemodialysis.

T Shulman1, A P Heidenheim, C Kianfar, S M Shulman, R M Lindsay.   

Abstract

The understanding of fluid changes during hemodialysis (HD is essential for reducing complications as well as efficacy of the procedure. Bioimpedance spectroscopy provides a non invasive method of measuring total body water (TBW), the distribution of intra (ICF) and extracellular (ECF) fluids, and their changes during HD. Segmental bioimpedance may be used to measure the same fluid shifts but from different body segments; the technique has previously been shown to com pare well with whole body measures. It is possible that fluid shifts occur differently in different body compartments during HD. Based on previous hemodynamic studies we postulated that during HD ultrafiltration (UF) the body attempts to preserve its central blood volume (cardiopulmonary circula tion plus great vessels), and thus fluid shifts would be greater from the periphery than from central compartments. To test this hypothesis, segmental bioimpedance (Xitron Technolo gies, San Diego, CA) was performed on 11 subjects undergoing HD where ECF and ICF values were obtained from the legs, arms and trunk before and after a period of UF. Blood volume change (ABV%) was also followed using an on-line optical hematocrit (Hct) sensor (Crit-Line monitor, In-Line Diagnostics, UT) where deltaBV% = deltaBV% = (1 - Hct1/Hct0) x 100 (Hct0 = baseline Hct; Hct1 = postultrafiltration Hct) The UF of 2.0 L +/- 0.79 L (M +/- SD) over 75 minutes was associated with a deltaBV% of -9.43% +/- 3.6% (M +/- SD), a significant (Student's paired t-test) reduction in total body (TB) ECF (p < 0.02), a weak correlation in reduction in TBW (p = 0.09) but not in TB ICF. The ECF reductions from the trunk, legs, and arms were all significant (minimum p < 0.02); no ICF changes from these compartments were significant. The amount of ECF reduction was greater from the legs (0.7 L +/- 0.6 L) than the arms (0.12 L +/- 0.08 L) and trunk (0.2 L +/- 0.2 L) (all M +/- SD). Multiple regression analysis showed that TB ECF changes correlated strongly with leg (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) and arm (r = 0.72, p = 0.002) ECF changes but not with trunk changes. deltaBV% correlated weakly with leg (r = 0.45, p = 0.08) and arm (r = 0.42, p = 0.10) ECF changes but not with the trunk. As the deltaBV% represents the net volume change between UF and plasma water refilling, thiss indicates that plasma water is being removed more from the peripheral compartments than from the trunk. These data suggest that plasma refilling during HD to preserve central blood volume is more dynamic from the leg ECF than from elsewhere and may, in turn, explain the frequent occurrence of leg cramps during and after hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11730198     DOI: 10.1097/00002480-200111000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  11 in total

1.  How do sock ply changes affect residual-limb fluid volume in people with transtibial amputation?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Katheryn J Allyn; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol; Elaine C Tsai
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

2.  The association between arterial stiffness and fluid status in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Ismail Kocyigit; Murat Hayri Sipahioglu; Ozcan Orscelik; Aydin Unal; Ahmet Celik; Samer R Abbas; Fansan Zhu; Bulent Tokgoz; Ali Dogan; Oktay Oymak; Peter Kotanko; Nathan W Levin
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  How does adding and removing liquid from socket bladders affect residual-limb fluid volume?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Kathryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

4.  Water removal from the legs does explain hypotension in short daily hemodialysis.

Authors:  A M Bales; L C Battaini; L L Nardotto; R S Humel; B C Silva; R M A Moyses; M C M Castro; R M Elias
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Monitoring intracellular, interstitial, and intravascular volume changes during fluid management procedures.

Authors:  Leslie D Montgomery; Wayne A Gerth; Richard W Montgomery; Susie Q Lew; Michael M Klein; Julian M Stewart; Marvin S Medow; Manuel T Velasquez
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Effects of elevated vacuum on in-socket residual limb fluid volume: case study results using bioimpedance analysis.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

7.  The Body Composition Monitor: a flexible tool for routine fluid management across the haemodialysis population.

Authors:  D F Keane; P Baxter; E Lindley; U Moissl; S Pavitt; L Rhodes; S Wieskotten
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-05-25

Review 8.  Interventions to prevent hemodynamic instability during renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adrianna Douvris; Gurpreet Malhi; Swapnil Hiremath; Lauralyn McIntyre; Samuel A Silver; Sean M Bagshaw; Ron Wald; Claudio Ronco; Lindsey Sikora; Catherine Weber; Edward G Clark
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Effect of ultrafiltration during hemodialysis on hepatic and total-body water: an observational study.

Authors:  Claire J Grant; Trevor P Wade; Charles A McKenzie; Guido Filler; Christopher W McIntyre; Shih-Han S Huang
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Assessment of fluid shifts of body compartments using both bioimpedance analysis and blood volume monitoring.

Authors:  Soo-Jeong Yu; Do-Hyoung Kim; Dong-Jin Oh; Suk-Hee Yu; Eung-Tack Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.