Literature DB >> 14614757

Reliability and variability of bioimpedance measures in normal adults: effects of age, gender, and body mass.

Manuela Dittmar1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the reliability and evaluate the causes of variability of bioimpedance parameters. Direct measures were analyzed because they are not affected by inappropriate prediction models. Resistance (R), reactance (Xc), and phase angle (PA) were determined at three fixed frequencies (5, 50, and 100 kHz) in 653 normal Germans (244 males and 409 females), aged 20-90 years, using a phase-sensitive whole-body tetrapolar bioimpedance analyzer (BIA 2000-M, Data Input, Germany). From these values, six bioimpedance ratios were calculated (R(5)/R(50), R(5)/R(100), Xc(5)/Xc(50), Xc(5)/Xc(100), PA(5)/PA(50), and PA(5)/PA(100)). Reliability of duplicate measurements, as determined by technical error, is high. ANOVA for repeated measurements yields a significant frequency main effect (within-subjects factor) and significant effects of age and gender (between-subject factors) on variation of resistance, reactance, and phase angle. Multiple regression analyses indicate independent effects of age, gender, and body mass index on variability of resistance, reactance, and phase angle at the three frequencies. Gender primarily influences variation in resistance (smaller values in males), whereas age mainly affects variations in reactance and phase angle (smaller values in older adults). Obesity is associated with smaller resistance (at all frequencies) and smaller reactance (high frequencies), but larger phase-angle values (low frequency). The study shows that variability of direct bioimpedance measures depends on age, gender, and body mass characteristics of the study population. The potential benefit for using both low and high frequencies in R measures is to differentiate between extra- and intracellular fluid spaces, which may be altered during human growth and aging. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14614757     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  38 in total

1.  How do sock ply changes affect residual-limb fluid volume in people with transtibial amputation?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Katheryn J Allyn; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol; Elaine C Tsai
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

2.  How does adding and removing liquid from socket bladders affect residual-limb fluid volume?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Kathryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

3.  Comparison of bioimpedance body composition in young adults in the Russian Children's Study.

Authors:  Sergey Rudnev; Jane S Burns; Paige L Williams; Mary M Lee; Susan A Korrick; Tatiana Denisova; Yuri Dikov; Gennady Kozupitsa; Russ Hauser; Oleg Sergeyev
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2019-11-16

4.  Could Objective Tests Be Used to Measure Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer?

Authors:  Gustavo Schvartsman; Minjeong Park; Diane D Liu; Sriram Yennu; Eduardo Bruera; David Hui
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Electromyographic amplitude versus torque relationships are different in young versus postmenopausal females and are related to muscle mass after controlling for bodyweight.

Authors:  Nile F Banks; Emily M Rogers; Nathaniel D M Jenkins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in detecting malnutrition among newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Teresa Małecka-Massalska; Radoslaw Mlak; Agata Smolen; Kamal Morshed
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Phase angle, frailty and mortality in older adults.

Authors:  Emilee R Wilhelm-Leen; Yoshio N Hall; Ralph I Horwitz; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition in surgical and oncological patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  E B Haverkort; P L M Reijven; J M Binnekade; M A E de van der Schueren; C P Earthman; D J Gouma; R J de Haan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Effects of elevated vacuum on in-socket residual limb fluid volume: case study results using bioimpedance analysis.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

10.  Parenteral nutrition support for patients with pancreatic cancer. Results of a phase II study.

Authors:  Uwe Pelzer; Dirk Arnold; Mehmet Gövercin; Jens Stieler; Bernd Doerken; Hanno Riess; Helmut Oettle
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.