Literature DB >> 11413600

Feasibility of day-care open cholecystectomy: evaluation in an inpatient model.

S Thomas1, J Singh, P K Bishnoi, A Kumar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open cholecystectomy is still a fairly frequently performed operation worldwide, and is used where laparoscopic surgery has failed or is contraindicated, and where some surgeons do not operate laparoscopically for technical reasons. In developing countries laparoscopic cholecystectomy is costly and is available only in a few centres. The present study was conducted to assess the feasibility of day-care open cholecystectomy using an inpatient model.
METHODS: Thirty patients were subjected to open cholecystectomy. Intraoperative nasogastric decompression and local wound infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine was carried out. Postoperatively patients were encouraged to be ambulant, pass urine and start oral fluids. Intravenous fluids and parenteral medication were stopped at 8 p.m. when patients were assessed for feasibility for discharge. All patients were reassessed the next morning for any adverse effects that could have occurred had the patients been discharged on the evening of surgery.
RESULTS: Prospectively, 73.3% of patients were considered to be dischargeable on the evening of surgery; but on reassessment the next morning, retrospectively, 93.3% of patients were actually dischargeable on the evening of surgery. A total of 76.6% of patients was actually discharged within 24 h of surgery. No patient required readmission. On follow up there were no complications that could be attributable to early discharge. A total of 83.3% of patients approved of day-care open cholecystectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Day-care open cholecystectomy is safe and feasible. In developing countries, where the use of laparoscopic surgery is limited due to resource constraints, day-care open cholecystectomy can lead to substantial savings in health-care resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11413600     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  5 in total

1.  A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Kalevi Karjalainen; Hannu Kokki; Hannu Paajanen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jari Kärkkäinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Kokki; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A successful model for laparoscopic training in Mongolia.

Authors:  Gabriela Vargas; Raymond R Price; Orgoi Sergelen; Byadran Lkhagvabayar; Pandaan Batcholuun; Tsiiregzen Enkhamagalan
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

4.  Short-stay daycare laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a dedicated daycare centre: Feasible or futile.

Authors:  Dinesh Zirpe; Sudeepta K Swain; Somak Das; C V Gopakumar; Sriharsha Kollu; Darshan Patel; Radhakrishna Patta; Tirupporur G Balachandar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Day Care Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Next Standard of Care for Gall Stone Disease.

Authors:  Lileswar Kaman; Javid Iqbal; Ishwar Bukhal; Divya Dahiya; Rajinder Singh
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2011-11-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.