Literature DB >> 10088574

Minicholecystectomy: a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure.

A K Seale, W P Ledet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document effectiveness of minicholecystectomy as a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure with rapid return to work.
DESIGN: Review of medical records.
SETTING: Small community hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 1207 patients who underwent minicholecystectomies from January 1, 1986, through December 31, 1997. INTERVENTION: Minicholecystectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications, length of hospital stay, cost, and time until return to work.
RESULTS: Of the 1207 patients who underwent minicholecystectomy, 74% were admitted for day surgery, 88% of whom were discharged in less than 12 hours, 9.3% in 24 hours or less, and 1.7% in greater than 24 hours; 0.3% were readmitted within 2 weeks. The complication rate was 0.2%; 2 cases required laparotomy, with no common duct injuries. The cost of the procedure was S435; the average time it took working patients to return to work was 11.4 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Minicholecystectomy is a safe, inexpensive day surgery method of cholecystectomy with minimal time off work after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10088574     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.134.3.308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  14 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  A Ros; L Gustafsson; H Krook; C E Nordgren; A Thorell; G Wallin; E Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A prospective, randomized study comparing minilaparotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day-surgery procedure: 5-year outcome.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Kalevi Karjalainen; Hannu Kokki; Hannu Paajanen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Small-incision cholecystectomy (through a cylinder retractor) under local anaesthesia and sedation: a prospective observational study of five hundred consecutive cases.

Authors:  Enrique J Grau-Talens; José Jacob Motos-Micó; Rafael Giraldo-Rubio; José M Aparicio-Gallego; José F Salgado; Carlos D Ibáñez; Pablo G Mangione-Castro; Martina Arribas-Jurado; Carlos Jordán-Chaves; Javier Arias-Díaz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  [Fast track rehabilitation in visceral surgery].

Authors:  W Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jari Kärkkäinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Kokki; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Trudy de Jonge; Hein G Gooszen; Erik Buskens; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Hein G Gooszen; Cornelis Jhm van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

8.  Mini-cholecystectomy: a personal series in acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  P Watanapa
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

10.  Non-randomised patients in a cholecystectomy trial: characteristics, procedures, and outcomes.

Authors:  Axel Ros; Per Carlsson; Mikael Rahmqvist; Karin Bäckman; Erik Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.