| Literature DB >> 24178757 |
I S Haldorsen1, I Stefansson2, R Grüner3, J A Husby1, I J Magnussen4, H M J Werner5, Ø O Salvesen6, L Bjørge5, J Trovik5, T Taxt7, L A Akslen2, H B Salvesen5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to study the angiogenic profile based on histomorphological markers in endometrial carcinomas in relation to imaging parameters obtained from preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and to explore the potential value of these markers to identify patients with poor outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24178757 PMCID: PMC3887294 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Clinicopathological patient characteristics
| Age; mean (range) years | 67 (41–93) |
| Postmenopausal, | 48 (89) |
| Endometrioid | 42 (78) |
| Clear cell | 2 (4) |
| Serous papillary | 6 (11) |
| Carcinosarcoma | 3 (6) |
| Undifferentiated | 1 (2) |
| Grade 1 | 17 (32) |
| Grade 2 | 11 (20) |
| Grade 3 | 26 (48) |
| 1A | 23 (43) |
| 1B | 14 (26) |
| 2 | 6 (11) |
| 3B | 1 (2) |
| 3C1 | 4 (7) |
| 3C2 | 5 (9) |
| 4B | 1 (2) |
Abbreviation: FIGO=International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
According to FIGO 2009 staging criteria (Pecorelli, 2009).
Figure 1Scatterplots depicting the negative correlation between microvascular proliferation in tumour tissue and estimated tumour blood flow (
Correlation between angiogenesis markers by immunohistochemistry and imaging markers in tumour tissue-based on preoperative DCE-MRI (perfusion markers), DWI (diffusion marker) and conventional MRI (tumour volume) in endometrial carcinomas (n=54)
| −0.03 (0.83) | ||
| 0.04 (0.79) | 0.24 (0.09) | |
| −0.03 (0.82) | 0.00 (0.97) | |
| 0.15 (0.26) | −0.22 (0.10) | |
| Vb; blood volume | 0.01 (0.97) | −0.23 (0.09) |
| Ve; fractional volume of EES | −0.10 (0.49) | −0.26 (0.06) |
| PS; capillary permeability surface area product | −0.04 (0.79) | |
| Ktrans; transfer from blood to EES | −0.03 (0.84) | |
| IAUGC over 60 s | −0.21 (0.12) | |
| IAUGC over 180 s | −0.15 (0.27) | |
| 0.12 (0.38) | 0.06 (0.65) | |
| −0.12 (0.39) | ||
Abbreviations: ADC=apparent diffusion coefficient; IAUGC=integrated area under the concentration time curve; DCE-MRI=dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; DWI,=diffusion-weighted imaging; EES=extravascular extracellular space.
Significant correlations are shown in bold. Independent imaging parameters are listed in italic.
Pearson correlation coefficient.
Pearson bivariate correlation test.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curves depicting recurrence/progression-free survival according to microvascular proliferation ( For each category: number of cases/number of cases with recurrence or progression. P-values refer to the Log Rank test.
Figure 3Sagittal ( The large uterine tumour invading ⩾50% of the myometrial wall is inhomogeneous and hyperintense (closed arrows) on T2-weighted image (A) and hypointense (closed arrows) relative to the normal myometrial tissue on DCE image (B) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (C). Calculated tumour blood flow (Fb) in the encircled ROI (B) was 3.5 ml/100 ml per minute indicating low blood flow. B1000 (D) depicts hyperintense tumour tissue (arrows) and corresponding hypointensity on ADC map (E) indicating restricted diffusion with a mean ADC value of 0.60 × 10−3 mm2 s−1 within the encircled ROI (E). Enlarged metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (B–F; open arrows) and peritoneal fluid in the recto-uterine pouch (A, curved arrow) were identified preoperatively. Immunohistochemical staining with Ki76/factor VIII (F; magnification × 400; arrows depict proliferating cells) showed 21 proliferating vessels per mm2 indicating high microvascular proliferation in the tumour. The patient was diagnosed with liver and lung metastases 5 months after primary surgical treatment (simple hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy) while still receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel).
Figure 4Sagittal T2-weighted image ( The tumour (arrows) invades <50% of the myometrial wall and is hyperintense on T2-weighted image and exhibits restricted diffusion with a mean ADC value of 0.93 × 10−3 mm2 s−1. Calculated tumour blood flow (Fb) was 13.5 ml per 100 ml per minute indicating relatively high blood flow. Immunohistochemical staining with Ki76/factor VIII (C; magnification × 400) showed low microvascular proliferation (0 proliferating vessels per mm2). The patient received primary treatment with hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy and had no signs of recurrence/progression during the following 3 years.