| Literature DB >> 26918726 |
Irene Tadeo1, Gloria Bueno2, Ana P Berbegall1, M Milagro Fernández-Carrobles2, Victoria Castel3, Marcial García-Rojo4, Samuel Navarro1, Rosa Noguera1.
Abstract
Angiogenesis is essential for tumor growth and metastasis, nevertheless, in NB, results between different studies on angiogenesis have yielded contradictory results. An image analysis tool was developed to characterize the density, size and shape of total blood vessels and vascular segments in 458 primary neuroblastic tumors contained in tissue microarrays. The results were correlated with clinical and biological features of known prognostic value and with risk of progression to establish histological vascular patterns associated with different degrees of malignancy. Total blood vessels were larger, more abundant and more irregularly-shaped in tumors of patients with associated poor prognostic factors than in the favorable cohort. Tumor capillaries were less abundant and sinusoids more abundant in the patient cohort with unfavorable prognostic factors. Additionally, size of post-capillaries & metarterioles as well as higher sinusoid density can be included as predictive factors for survival. These patterns may therefore help to provide more accurate pre-treatment risk stratification, and could provide candidate targets for novel therapies.Entities:
Keywords: blood vessels; capillaries; extracellular matrix; neuroblastoma; sinusoids
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26918726 PMCID: PMC4991429 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1A–A') Example of a cylinder with no expression for CD31 antibody except for two stained blood vessels
A. Detail of a negative area filled with erythrocytes. A'. Detail of an area with two CD31 positive blood vessels. B. Example of a blood vessel with incomplete outline. Note the neuroblastic-like cells occupying the area without epithelial cells (arrow). C. Example of a vascular structure outlined by cubic cells not expressing CD31, with erythrocytes inside. D. Blood vessel invaded by tumor cells. E. It is difficult to determine if tumor cells are invading a blood vessel or if many intermingled vessels surround a tumor cell cluster. Some small vessels can be observed inside the tumor cell cluster.
Figure 2High endothelial venules
A. within a tertiary lymph node, B. in close relationship with individual leukocytes within the tumor stroma. A', B'. Stainings to visualize the surrounding immune cells.
Schematic representation of the morphometric parameters measured and how the results are stated in the paper
| Parameter | Low | High | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stated in the text | Schema | Stated in the text | Schema | |
| Quantity | ||||
| Density | Low density | High density | ||
| Stained area (SA) | Low SA | High SA | ||
| Relative density/SA of blood vessels corresponding to a given segment compared with the total vascularization | Low proportion of blood vessels | High proportion blood vessels | ||
| Size | ||||
| Area | Small | Large | ||
| Length | Short | Long | ||
| Width | Thin | Thick | ||
| Perimeter | Small | Large | ||
| Shape | ||||
| Aspect | Round | Ovoid | ||
| Roundness | Few | Abundant | ||
| Perimeter ratio | Irregular outline | Regular outline | ||
| Deformity | Weak deformity | Strong deformity | ||
| Shape factor | Similar to convex contour | Dissimilar to convex contour | ||
| Branching | Unbranched | Branched | ||
Aspect: Major axis/minor axis (of ellipse equivalent to the vessel).
Roundness: Perimeter2/(4*π*area).
Perimeter ratio: Convex contour perimeter/perimeter (convex contour: outline of the polygon best-fitting to the real shape).
Deformity: Convex contour area-area (μm2).
Shape factor: Matches the shape (including the centroids, the area, and information about the orientation) of the vessels and the convex contour (formula: max=1,2[│mA-mB│/│mA│]; mA/B=sign (hA/B)· log(hA); A/B=Hu moments of real contour/convex contour; í = seven Hu invariant).
All these parameters provide information about the degree of deviation from a round and regular blood vessel, using different approaches.
Figure 3Examples and illustration of the vascular patterns in a neuroblastic tumor with favorable prognostic factors (A–C) and with unfavorable prognostic factors (A'–C'), illustrated by a GN and a pdNB, respectively
A. Sample corresponding to a favorable NB. Differentiated histology with ganglion cells can be appreciated, with few blood vessels, mostly corresponding to capillaries. A binarized image is presented with blood vessels in white on a black background for a better view. A'. Sample corresponding to an unfavorable sample with rich blood vascularization, mostly corresponding to abnormal sinusoids. A binarized image is presented with blood vessels in white on a black background for a better view. B. and B'. Detail of the A and A' areas in the squares. C. Cylinder presenting a vascular pattern of a neuroblastic tumor with favorable prognostic factors where neuroblastic cells differentiate in a microenvironment well irrigated by capillaries, rich in fundamental substance to which they can bind and with a very loose meshwork of reticulin fibers. C'. Cylinder presenting a vascular pattern of a neuroblastic tumor with favorable prognostic factors presenting an extracellular matrix with a poor amount of capillaries and an increased presence of sinusoid vessels, which could promote cell extravasation and intravasation. A poorly-porous extracellular matrix is also defined by the reticulin fiber scaffolding.
p-values and nature of the relationship between total vascularization and the INRG poor-prognostic factors
| Parameter | Stage: metastatic | Age: >18 months | Histopathology: (pd, uNB) | Genetic profile: SCA | 11q: 11qD | Risk group: high-risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | - | - | 0.008↑ | - | - | - | - |
| SA | - | - | 0.033↑ | - | - | - | - |
| Area | - | - | 0.000↑ | - | - | 0.006↑ | |
| Length | - | - | - | 0.001↑ | - | - | 0.006↑ |
| Width | - | - | - | 0.000↑ | - | - | 0.000↑ |
| Perimeter | - | - | - | 0.000↑ | - | - | 0.006↑ |
| Aspect | 0.036↓ | - | 0.000↓ | 0.001↓ | - | 0.043↓ | 0.002↓ |
| Roundness | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Per. ratio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Deformity | - | - | - | 0.001↑ | - | - | 0.026↑ |
| Shape factor | - | - | 0.014↓ | 0.046↓ | - | - | - |
| Branching | 0.045↑ | - | - | 0.000↑ | - | - | 0.001↑ |
SA: Stained area, Per. ratio: perimeter ratio, -: not statistically significant, ↑/↓: higher or lower median value for the poor-prognostic group(s)
statistically significant differences between the different degrees of differentiation within the NB histological category.
p-values and nature of the relationship between the capillaries and the INRG poor-prognostic factors
| Parameter | Stage: metastatic | Age: >18 months | Histopathology: (pd, uNB) | Genetic profile: SCA | 11q: 11qD | Risk group: high-risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | - | - | 0.008↑ | - | - | - | - |
| SA | - | 0.040↓ | 0.028↑, | 0.021↓ | - | - | - |
| Rel. density | - | - | - | 0.018↓ | - | - | - |
| Rel. SA | - | 0.039↓ | - | 0.032↓ | - | - | - |
| Area | - | - | 0.001↑ | 0.001↑ | - | - | 0.006↑ |
| Length | - | - | 0.010↑ | - | - | - | - |
| Width | - | - | 0.001↑ | 0.001↑ | - | - | 0.003↑ |
| Perimeter | - | - | 0.001↑ | - | - | - | - |
| Aspect | - | - | 0.001↓ | 0.000↓ | - | - | 0.001↓ |
| Roundness | - | - | 0.001↓ | 0.000↓ | - | - | 0.002↓ |
| Per. ratio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Deformity | - | 0.046↓ | 0.015↑ | - | - | - | - |
| Shape factor | 0.026↓ | - | 0.000↓ | 0.000↓ | - | - | 0.000↓ |
| Branching | - | - | 0.007↑ | - | - | - | - |
SA: Stained area Rel. density: relative density, Rel. SA: relative SA, Per. ratio: perimeter ratio, -: not statistically significant, ↑/↓: higher or lower median value for the poor-prognostic group(s)
statistically significant differences between the different degrees of differentiation within the NB histological category.
p-values and nature of the relationship between the sinusoids and the INRG poor-prognostic factors
| Parameter | Stage: metastatic | Age: >18 months | Histopathology: (pd, uNB) | Genetic profile: SCA | 11q: 11qD | Risk group: high-risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 0.050↑ | - | 0.041↑ | - | - | - | - |
| SA | - | - | 0.024↑ | - | - | - | - |
| Rel. density | 0.043↑ | - | - | 0.004↑ | - | - | 0.034↑ |
| Rel. SA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Area | - | - | 0.035↑, | 0.000↑ | - | - | 0.001↑ |
| Length | - | - | - | 0.015↑ | - | - | - |
| Width | 0.024↑ | - | 0.018 ↑ | 0.004↑ | - | - | 0.001↑ |
| Perimeter | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Aspect | 0.001↓ | - | 0.005↓ | 0.017↓ | - | - | 0.001↓ |
| Roundness | 0.018↓ | - | 0.000↓ | - | - | 0.000↓ | |
| Per. ratio | - | - | 0.016↓ | 0.022↑ | - | - | - |
| Deformity | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Shape factor | 0.000↓ | - | 0.001↓, | 0.000↓ | - | - | 0.000↓ |
| Branching | 0.017↑ | 0.033↑ | - | 0.043↑ | - | - | 0.000↑ |
SA: Stained area Rel. density: relative density, Rel. SA: relative SA, Per. ratio: perimeter ratio, -: not statistically significant, ↑/↓: higher or lower median value for the poor-prognostic group(s)
statistically significant differences between the different degrees of differentiation within the NB histological category.
p-values and nature of the relationship between the post-capillary venules and metarterioles and the INRG poor-prognostic factors
| Parameter | Stage: metastatic | Age: >18 months | Histopathology: (pd, uNB) | Genetic profile: SCA | 11q: 11qD | Risk group: high-risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | - | 0.034↓ | - | - | - | - | - |
| SA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rel. density | - | - | - | 0.023↑ | - | - | - |
| Rel. SA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Area | 0.018↑ | - | - | 0.000↑ | - | - | 0.000↑ |
| Length | 0.033↑ | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Width | 0.039↑ | - | - | 0.003↑ | - | - | 0.000↑ |
| Perimeter | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Aspect | 0.044↓ | - | 0.013↓ | 0.005↓ | - | - | 0.000↓ |
| Roundness | - | - | - | 0.000↑ | - | - | 0.000↓ |
| Per. ratio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Deformity | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Shape factor | 0.012↓ | - | 0.039↓ | 0.000↓ | - | - | 0.000↓ |
| Branching | - | - | - | 0.005↑ | - | - | 0.000↑ |
SA: Stained area Rel. density: relative density, Rel. SA: relative SA, Per. ratio: perimeter ratio, -: not statistically significant, ↑/↓: higher or lower median value for the poor-prognostic group(s).
Influence of INRG prognostic factors and morphometric variables of total vascularization and blood vessel segments with value as new prognostic factors on poor EFS and/or OS of neuroblastoma patients
| Variable | Wald | HR (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total vascularization, EFS and OS | |||
| Non-informative | |||
| Capillaries, EFS and OS | |||
| Non-informative | |||
| Sinusoids, EFS | |||
| Metastatic stage | 20.1 | 0.000 | |
| MNA | 16.4 | 3.2 (1.8-5.8) | 0.000 |
| Short length | 8.6 | 0.8 (0.7-0.9) | 0.003 |
| 11qD | 8.1 | 2.2 (1.2-3.9) | 0.004 |
| Sinusoids, OS | |||
| MNA | 24.1 | 5.0 (2.6-9.5) | 0.000 |
| Metastatic stage | 19.9 | 0.000 | |
| Short length | 9.8 | 0.8 (0.7-0.9) | 0.002 |
| High relative density | 6.6 | 1.0 (1.0-1.1) | 0.002 |
| 11qD | 5.6 | 2.1 (1.1-4.0) | 0.017 |
| Post-capillaries & metarterioles, EFS | |||
| Metastatic stage | 22.04 | 0.000 | |
| uNB&pdNB | 6.9 | 0.072 | |
| Large width | 7.7 | 1.4 (1.1-1.7) | 0.005 |
| SCA | 4.9 | 2.5 (1.1-5.7) | 0.027 |
| Short length | 4.4 | 0.7 (0.5-0.9) | 0.035 |
| Post-capillaries & metarterioles, OS | |||
| Non-informative |
EFS: Event-free survival, OS: Overall survival, MNA: MYCN amplification, 11qD: 11q deletion, u: undifferentiated NB, pd: poorly differentiated NB, SCA: Segmental chromosome aberrations.
Figure 4Types of blood vessels stained with immunohistochemistry anti-CD31 in neuroblastoma samples
Differences in blood vessel networks can be appreciated between sinusoids and capillaries. Sinusoidal networks are shown as discontinuous capillaries with more variable forms and sizes, irregular shapes and larger caliber (around 20 to 50 μm) than an ordinary capillaries. Capillary networks are composed by vascular tubes, measuring around 5-15 μm, lined with an uninterrupted layer of endothelial cells. The intrinsic design of the TMAs avoided areas with huge vascular structures so very few samples presented venules & arterioles and veins & arteries in their ECM (1.7% and 0.1% of all present blood vessels, respectively), thus these structures were not considered.