| Literature DB >> 29312587 |
Núria Eritja1,2, Mariona Jové3, Kristine Eldevik Fasmer4,5, Sònia Gatius1,2, Manuel Portero-Otin3, Jone Trovik6,7, Camilla Krakstad6,7, Joaquim Sol3, Reinald Pamplona3, Ingfrid S Haldorsen4,5, Xavier Matias-Guiu1,2,8.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to study the potential influence of tumour blood flow -obtained from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)- in the metabolomic profiles of endometrial tumours.Entities:
Keywords: DCE-MRI; blood flow; endometrial cancer; metabolomic analysis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29312587 PMCID: PMC5752500 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Clinicopathological patient characteristics (n = 26) of women treated for endometrial cancer and evaluated by enhanced contrast MRI and metabolomics
| 68 (41-93) | |
| Postmenopausal, n (%) | 23 (89) |
| Lymph node sampling performed, n (%) | 21 (81) |
| Adjuvant therapy received, n (%) | 9 (35) |
| IA | 10 (39) |
| IB | 7 (27) |
| II | 4 (15) |
| III | 4 (15) |
| IV | 1 (4) |
| Grade 1 | 5 (19) |
| Grade 2 | 5 (19) |
| Grade 3 | 16 (62) |
| Endometrioid | 20 (77) |
| Clear cell | 1 (4) |
| Serous | 3 (11) |
| Carcinosarcoma | 2 (8) |
aAccording to International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging criteria (ref)
Figure 1PCA demonstrate a metabolomic-specific signature depending on tumour blood flow in endometrial cancer patients
Red spots represent high tumour blood flow and green spots represent low tumour blood flow as determined by DCE-MRI.
Figure 2(A) Ortho-PLSDA algorithm using all metabolites found in samples from endometrial cancer tumours is able to discriminate groups with an observed Q2 of 0. 656 and observed R2Y of 0.985. Red spots represent high tumour blood flow patients and green spots represent low tumour blood flow as determined by DCE- MRI. (B) RF classification shows and overall classification error of 0.07.
Metabolites from endometrial cancersignificantly different expressed in tumors with high versus low blood flow (Fb) determined by dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI blood flow (Student’s T-Test, p<0.05)
| Potential ID (exact mass) | p (Corr) | Regulation (H vs L) | FC | Mass | Retention Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 0.001717 | down | -3140.98 | 645.2509 | 12.776092 |
| Unknown | 0.002955 | down | -1.55451 | 529.339 | 10.614731 |
| Unknown | 0.002955 | down | -2.36942 | 640.2945 | 12.776231 |
| LysoPS(14:0) | 0.002955 | up | 1313.153 | 469.2301 | 11.289364 |
| Unknown | 0.002955 | up | 2939.315 | 644.3455 | 12.713154 |
| MG(20:3) | 0.005209 | up | 2786.49 | 380.2894 | 11.154073 |
| LysoPI(20:0) | 0.00663 | up | 451.2966 | 628.3694 | 12.711375 |
| LysoPC(18:1) | 0.0079 | up | 7360.114 | 521.3482 | 11.1267 |
| Unknown | 0.0079 | up | 744.7858 | 675.3582 | 12.709785 |
| Unknown | 0.0079 | up | 784.6694 | 380.7346 | 13.018824 |
| Unknown | 0.008335 | up | 3.061549 | 588.4521 | 12.71631 |
| Unknown | 0.008335 | up | 1489.749 | 395.3035 | 10.927358 |
| Unknown | 0.009024 | up | 4.129054 | 530.4012 | 12.716731 |
| Unknown | 0.010229 | up | 584.1685 | 294.2502 | 11.812234 |
| Unknown | 0.017847 | down | -1.76119 | 497.3935 | 5.910731 |
| LysoPC(20:3) | 0.027094 | up | 1097.7 | 545.3473 | 10.9397335 |
| Unknown | 0.029734 | down | -1.53841 | 185.2144 | 4.237846 |
| Resolvin D | 0.03647 | up | 480.5512 | 376.2332 | 10.606182 |
| Unknown | 0.03647 | down | -135.16 | 639.5252 | 12.372849 |
| PC(42:2) | 0.03647 | down | -251.465 | 869.6867 | 13.405749 |
| Unknown | 0.03647 | down | -175.365 | 915.7157 | 13.490999 |
| Unknown | 0.03647 | up | 319.0776 | 563.4208 | 12.652739 |
| Unknown | 0.03647 | up | 275.0069 | 344.2021 | 12.714 |
| Unknown | 0.03647 | down | -297.762 | 890.7981 | 14.891124 |
| NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta-Cer(d34:1) | 0.03647 | up | 274.8682 | 990.6635 | 10.921999 |
| Unknown | 0.03647 | up | 383.5934 | 410.2134 | 11.286181 |
| Unknown | 0.04131 | up | 861.9869 | 901.5447 | 13.720384 |
| PI-Cer(t46:0(2OH)) | 0.044655 | up | 223.0672 | 981.7524 | 12.743363 |
Figure 3(A) ROC curve of tumour resolvin D levels. (B) Hierarchical clustering analyses using 25 most statistical significant metabolites significantly different between endometrial cancer tumours with high versus low blood flow (Student’s T-Test, Benjamini Hochberg False Discovery Rate, p<0.05). Unknown identities are represented as exact mass@retention time.
Figure 4Axial oblique T2-weighted MRI (left panel), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (middle panel) and parametric blood flow (Fb, right panel) map from a 68 year-old patient with FIGO stage 1B, grade 3 and high tumour Fb (upper panel) and a 52 year-old patient with FIGO stage 1B, grade 1 and low tumour Fb (lower panel). At conventional diagnostic MRI the endometrial carcinomas (arrows) are typically depicted as hyper-intense relative to the surrounding myometrium on T2-weigthed image while hypo-intense on contrast-enhanced T1-weighed image. On the corresponding parametric maps high blood flow is depicted as white/red while low blood flow is depicted as dark blue.