OBJECTIVES: To study the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for assessment of tumour microvasculature in endometrial carcinoma patients, and to explore correlations with histological subtype, clinical course and microstructural characteristics based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. METHODS: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and three-dimensional DCE-MRI (1.5 T) with high temporal resolution (2.49 s) were acquired preoperatively in 55 patients. Quantitative modelling allowed the calculation of four independent parameters describing microvasculature: blood flow (Fb), extraction fraction (E), capillary transit time (Tc) and transfer constant from the extravascular extracellular space [EES] to blood (Kep); and four derived parameters: blood volume (Vb), volume of EES (Ve), capillary permeability surface area product (PS) and transfer from blood to EES (Ktrans). RESULTS: Endometrial carcinoma tissue exhibited reduced Fb, E, Vb, Ve, PS and Ktrans compared with normal myometrium. Non-endometrioid carcinomas (n = 12) had lower Fb, and E than endometrioid carcinomas (n = 43; P < 0.05). Tumour Ve positively correlated with tumour ADC value (r = 0.29, P = 0.03). Reduced survival was observed in patients with low tumour Fb and high tumour Tc (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of DCE-MRI in reflecting histological subtype and clinical course in primary endometrial carcinomas. DCE-MRI may potentially provide future biomarkers for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinomas. KEY POINTS: • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) offers new information about endometrial carcinoma. • Pelvic DCE-MRI with subsequent quantitative modelling seems feasible in endometrial carcinoma patients. • Low tumour perfusion is a feature of a more aggressive tumour subtype. • DCE-MRI provides potential biomarkers for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinoma patients.
OBJECTIVES: To study the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for assessment of tumour microvasculature in endometrial carcinomapatients, and to explore correlations with histological subtype, clinical course and microstructural characteristics based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. METHODS: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and three-dimensional DCE-MRI (1.5 T) with high temporal resolution (2.49 s) were acquired preoperatively in 55 patients. Quantitative modelling allowed the calculation of four independent parameters describing microvasculature: blood flow (Fb), extraction fraction (E), capillary transit time (Tc) and transfer constant from the extravascular extracellular space [EES] to blood (Kep); and four derived parameters: blood volume (Vb), volume of EES (Ve), capillary permeability surface area product (PS) and transfer from blood to EES (Ktrans). RESULTS:Endometrial carcinoma tissue exhibited reduced Fb, E, Vb, Ve, PS and Ktrans compared with normal myometrium. Non-endometrioid carcinomas (n = 12) had lower Fb, and E than endometrioid carcinomas (n = 43; P < 0.05). Tumour Ve positively correlated with tumour ADC value (r = 0.29, P = 0.03). Reduced survival was observed in patients with low tumour Fb and high tumour Tc (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of DCE-MRI in reflecting histological subtype and clinical course in primary endometrial carcinomas. DCE-MRI may potentially provide future biomarkers for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinomas. KEY POINTS: • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) offers new information about endometrial carcinoma. • Pelvic DCE-MRI with subsequent quantitative modelling seems feasible in endometrial carcinomapatients. • Low tumour perfusion is a feature of a more aggressive tumour subtype. • DCE-MRI provides potential biomarkers for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinomapatients.
Authors: Frederic Amant; Philippe Moerman; Patrick Neven; Dirk Timmerman; Erik Van Limbergen; Ignace Vergote Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Aug 6-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Timothy J Perren; Ann Marie Swart; Jacobus Pfisterer; Jonathan A Ledermann; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Gunnar Kristensen; Mark S Carey; Philip Beale; Andrés Cervantes; Christian Kurzeder; Andreas du Bois; Jalid Sehouli; Rainer Kimmig; Anne Stähle; Fiona Collinson; Sharadah Essapen; Charlie Gourley; Alain Lortholary; Frédéric Selle; Mansoor R Mirza; Arto Leminen; Marie Plante; Dan Stark; Wendi Qian; Mahesh K B Parmar; Amit M Oza Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sigmund Ytre-Hauge; Jenny A Husby; Inger J Magnussen; Henrica M J Werner; Øyvind O Salvesen; Line Bjørge; Jone Trovik; Ingunn M Stefansson; Helga B Salvesen; Ingfrid S Haldorsen Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: I S Haldorsen; I Stefansson; R Grüner; J A Husby; I J Magnussen; H M J Werner; Ø O Salvesen; L Bjørge; J Trovik; T Taxt; L A Akslen; H B Salvesen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Anna Berg; Kristine E Fasmer; Karen K Mauland; Sigmund Ytre-Hauge; Erling A Hoivik; Jenny A Husby; Ingvild L Tangen; Jone Trovik; Mari K Halle; Kathrine Woie; Line Bjørge; Atle Bjørnerud; Helga B Salvesen; Henrica M J Werner; Camilla Krakstad; Ingfrid S Haldorsen Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-10-25