Literature DB >> 32148445

Benefit of Contact Force-Guided Catheter Ablation for Treating Premature Ventricular Contractions.

Ziming Zhao, Xiaowei Liu, Lianjun Gao, Yutao Xi, Qi Chen, Dong Chang, Xianjie Xiao, Jie Cheng, Yanzong Yang, Yunlong Xia, Xiaomeng Yin.   

Abstract

We evaluated whether an irrigated contact force-sensing catheter would improve the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the right ventricular outflow tract. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with symptomatic premature ventricular contractions who underwent ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter (56 patients, SmartTouch) or conventional catheter (59 patients, ThermoCool) at our hospital from August 2013 through December 2015. During a mean follow-up of 16 ± 5 months, 3 patients in the conventional group had recurrences, compared with none in the contact force group. Complications occurred only in the conventional group (one steam pop; 2 ablations suspended because of significantly increasing impedance). In the contact force group, the median contact force during ablation was 10 g (interquartile range, 7-14 g). Times for overall procedure (36.9 ± 5 min), fluoroscopy (86.3 ± 22.7 s), and ablation (60.3 ± 21.4 s) were significantly shorter in the contact force group than in the conventional group (46.2 ± 6.2 min, 107.7 ± 30 s, and 88.7 ± 32.3 s, respectively; P <0.001). In the contact force group, cases with a force-time integral <560 gram-seconds (g-s) had significantly longer procedure and fluoroscopy times (both P <0.001) than did those with a force-time integral ≥560 g-s. These findings suggest that ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the right ventricular outflow tract with an irrigated contact force-sensing catheter instead of a conventional catheter shortens overall procedure, fluoroscopy, and ablation times without increasing risk of recurrence or complications.
© 2020 by the Texas Heart® Institute, Houston.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac catheters; catheter ablation/instrumentation/methods; electrophysiologic techniques, cardiac/methods; operative time; predictive value of tests; retrospective studies; treatment outcome; ventricular function

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32148445      PMCID: PMC7046358          DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-17-6441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  21 in total

1.  Area under the real-time contact force curve (force-time integral) predicts radiofrequency lesion size in an in vitro contractile model.

Authors:  Dipen C Shah; Hendrik Lambert; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Arne Langenkamp; Nicolas Aeby; Giovanni Leo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09

2.  Local unipolar and bipolar electrogram criteria for evaluating the transmurality of atrial ablation lesions at different catheter orientations relative to the endocardial surface.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Otomo; Kikuya Uno; Hideomi Fujiwara; Mitsuaki Isobe; Yoshito Iesaka
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Lesion Formation for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Adam S Barnett; Tristram D Bahnson; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-05

4.  A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Kuck; Vivek Y Reddy; Boris Schmidt; Andrea Natale; Petr Neuzil; Nadir Saoudi; Josef Kautzner; Claudia Herrera; Gerhard Hindricks; Pierre Jaïs; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Hendrik Lambert; Dipen C Shah
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  A prospective study on safety of catheter ablation procedures: contact force guided ablation could reduce the risk of cardiac perforation.

Authors:  Ferdi Akca; Petter Janse; Dominic A M J Theuns; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Importance of catheter contact force during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model using a force-sensing catheter.

Authors:  Aravinda Thiagalingam; Andre D'Avila; Lori Foley; J Luis Guerrero; Hendrik Lambert; Giovanni Leo; Jeremy N Ruskin; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-02-01

Review 7.  Role of contact force-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Lin; Yi-He Chen; Jian-Wen Hou; Zhao-Yang Lu; Yin Xiang; Yi-Gang Li
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06-23

8.  Steam pops during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: feasibility of impedance monitoring for prevention.

Authors:  Jens Seiler; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Jean-Marc Raymond; John Vest; Etienne Delacretaz; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus.

Authors:  Katsuaki Yokoyama; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Dipen C Shah; Hendrik Lambert; Giovanni Leo; Nicolas Aeby; Atsushi Ikeda; Jan V Pitha; Tushar Sharma; Ralph Lazzara; Warren M Jackman
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-12-02

10.  Catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia using contact force guidance.

Authors:  S D A Valk; N M S de Groot; L Jordaens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contact Force-Sensing versus Standard Catheters in Non-Fluoroscopic Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Grzegorz Karkowski; Marcin Kuniewicz; Andrzej Ząbek; Edward Koźluk; Maciej Dębski; Paweł T Matusik; Jacek Lelakowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.