Literature DB >> 24167279

Symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes are the protein-folding functional form of the chaperonin nanomachine.

Dong Yang1, Xiang Ye, George H Lorimer.   

Abstract

Using calibrated FRET, we show that the simultaneous occupancy of both rings of GroEL by ATP and GroES occurs, leading to the rapid formation of symmetric GroEL:GroES2 "football" particles regardless of the presence or absence of substrate protein (SP). In the absence of SP, these symmetric particles revert to asymmetric GroEL:GroES1 "bullet" particles. The breakage of GroES symmetry requires the stochastic hydrolysis of ATP and the breakage of nucleotide symmetry. These asymmetric particles are both persistent and dynamic; they turnover via the asymmetric cycle. When challenged with SP, however, they revert to symmetric particles within a second. In the presence of SP, the symmetric particles are also persistent and dynamic. They turn over via the symmetric cycle. Under these conditions, the stochastic hydrolysis of ATP and the breakage of nucleotide symmetry also occur within the ensemble of particles. However, on account of SP-catalyzed ADP/ATP exchange, GroES symmetry is rapidly restored. The residence time of both GroES and SP on functional GroEL is reduced to ∼1 s, enabling many more iterations than was previously believed possible, consistent with the iterative annealing mechanism. This result is inconsistent with currently accepted models. Using a foldable SP, we show that as the SP folds to the native state and the population of unfolded SP declines, the population of symmetric particles reverts to asymmetric particles in parallel, a result that is consistent with the former being the folding functional form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24167279      PMCID: PMC3832010          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318862110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  Catalysis, commitment and encapsulation during GroE-mediated folding.

Authors:  M Beissinger; K Rutkat; J Buchner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-06-18       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  On the role of symmetrical and asymmetrical chaperonin complexes in assisted protein folding.

Authors:  M K Hayer-Hartl; K L Ewalt; F U Hartl
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.915

3.  Repetitive protein unfolding by the trans ring of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex stimulates folding.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Jason Puchalla; Daniel Shoup; Hays S Rye
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Substrate protein switches GroE chaperonins from asymmetric to symmetric cycling by catalyzing nucleotide exchange.

Authors:  Xiang Ye; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism.

Authors:  M J Todd; G H Lorimer; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings.

Authors:  N M Kad; N A Ranson; M J Cliff; A R Clarke
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04-24       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Catalysis of protein folding by symmetric chaperone complexes.

Authors:  H Sparrer; K Rutkat; J Buchner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Symmetric GroEL-GroES complexes can contain substrate simultaneously in both GroEL rings.

Authors:  O Llorca; S Marco; J L Carrascosa; J M Valpuesta
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1997-03-24       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  GroEL traps dimeric and monomeric unfolding intermediates of citrate synthase.

Authors:  H Grallert; K Rutkat; J Buchner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings.

Authors:  H S Rye; A M Roseman; S Chen; K Furtak; W A Fenton; H R Saibil; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  33 in total

1.  Reconciling the controversy regarding the functional importance of bullet- and football-shaped GroE complexes.

Authors:  Lavi S Bigman; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Effects of C-terminal Truncation of Chaperonin GroEL on the Yield of In-cage Folding of the Green Fluorescent Protein.

Authors:  So Ishino; Yasushi Kawata; Hideki Taguchi; Naoko Kajimura; Katsumi Matsuzaki; Masaru Hoshino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  The chaperone toolbox at the single-molecule level: From clamping to confining.

Authors:  Mario J Avellaneda; Eline J Koers; Mohsin M Naqvi; Sander J Tans
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  The C-terminal tails of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL stimulate protein folding by directly altering the conformation of a substrate protein.

Authors:  Jeremy Weaver; Hays S Rye
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Formation and structures of GroEL:GroES2 chaperonin footballs, the protein-folding functional form.

Authors:  Xue Fei; Xiang Ye; Nicole A LaRonde; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Substrate protein dependence of GroEL-GroES interaction cycle revealed by high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging.

Authors:  Daisuke Noshiro; Toshio Ando
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Iterative annealing mechanism explains the functions of the GroEL and RNA chaperones.

Authors:  D Thirumalai; George H Lorimer; Changbong Hyeon
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  Multiple chaperonins in bacteria--novel functions and non-canonical behaviors.

Authors:  C M Santosh Kumar; Shekhar C Mande; Gaurang Mahajan
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  GroEL/ES chaperonin modulates the mechanism and accelerates the rate of TIM-barrel domain folding.

Authors:  Florian Georgescauld; Kristina Popova; Amit J Gupta; Andreas Bracher; John R Engen; Manajit Hayer-Hartl; F Ulrich Hartl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Crystal structure of the human mitochondrial chaperonin symmetrical football complex.

Authors:  Shahar Nisemblat; Oren Yaniv; Avital Parnas; Felix Frolow; Abdussalam Azem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.