Literature DB >> 9571049

Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings.

N M Kad1, N A Ranson, M J Cliff, A R Clarke.   

Abstract

The ATPase cycle of GroE chaperonins has been examined by transient kinetics to dissect partial reactions in complexes where GroEL is asymmetrically loaded with nucleotides. The occupation of one heptameric ring by ADP does not inhibit the loading of the other with ATP nor does it prevent the consequent structural rearrangement to the "open" state. However, ADP binding completely inhibits ATP hydrolysis in the asymmetric complex, i.e. ATP cannot by hydrolysed when ADP is bound to the other ring. This non-competitive inhibition of the ATPase by ADP is consistent with a ring-switching, or "two-stroke", mechanism of the type: ATP:GroEL --> ADP:GroEL --> ADP:GroEL:ATP --> GroEL:ATP --> GroEL:ADP, i.e. with respect to the GroEL rings, ATP turns over in an alternating fashion. When the ATP-stabilized, "open" state is challenged with hexokinase and glucose, to quench the free ATP, the open state relaxes slowly (0.44 s-1) back to the apo (or closed) conformation. This rate, however, is three times faster than the hydrolytic step, showing that bound ATP is not committed to hydrolysis. When GroES is bound to the GroEL:ATP complex and the system is quenched in the same way, approximately half of the bound ATP undergoes hydrolysis on the chaperonin complex showing that the co-protein increases the degree of commitment. Thus, non-competitive inhibition of ATP hydrolysis, combined with the ability of the co-protein to block ligand exchange between rings has the effect of imposing a reciprocating cycle of reactions with ATP hydrolysing, and GroES binding, on each of the GroEL rings in turn. Taken together, these data imply that the dominant, productive steady state reaction in vivo is: GroEL:ATP:GroES --> GroEL:ADP:GroES --> ATP:GroEL:ADP:GroES --> ATP:GroEL:ADP --> GroES:ATP:GroEL:ADP --> GroES:ATP:GroEL for a hemi-cycle, and that significant inhibi tion of hydrolysis may arise through the formation of a dead-end ADP:GroEL:ATP:GroES complex. Copyright 1998 Academic Press Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9571049     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  21 in total

Review 1.  Chaperone rings in protein folding and degradation.

Authors:  A L Horwich; E U Weber-Ban; D Finley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  GroES in the asymmetric GroEL14-GroES7 complex exchanges via an associative mechanism.

Authors:  P M Horowitz; G H Lorimer; J Ybarra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Application of fluorescence resonance energy transfer to the GroEL-GroES chaperonin reaction.

Authors:  H S Rye
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  Ionic interactions at both inter-ring contact sites of GroEL are involved in transmission of the allosteric signal: a time-resolved infrared difference study.

Authors:  Begoña Sot; Fritzthof von Germar; Werner Mäntele; Jose María Valpuesta; Stefka G Taneva; Arturo Muga
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Glu257 in GroEL is a sensor involved in coupling polypeptide substrate binding to stimulation of ATP hydrolysis.

Authors:  Oded Danziger; Liat Shimon; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.250

7.  Stimulating the substrate folding activity of a single ring GroEL variant by modulating the cochaperonin GroES.

Authors:  Melissa Illingworth; Andrew Ramsey; Zhida Zheng; Lingling Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Do chaperonins boost protein yields by accelerating folding or preventing aggregation?

Authors:  A I Jewett; J-E Shea
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Kinetic analysis of conformational changes of GroEL based on the fluorescence of tyrosine 506.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Hosono; Taro Ueno; Hideki Taguchi; Fumihiro Motojima; Tamotsu Zako; Masasuke Yoshida; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.371

10.  Setting the chaperonin timer: the effects of K+ and substrate protein on ATP hydrolysis.

Authors:  John P Grason; Jennifer S Gresham; Lusiana Widjaja; Sarah C Wehri; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.