Literature DB >> 10384959

On the role of symmetrical and asymmetrical chaperonin complexes in assisted protein folding.

M K Hayer-Hartl1, K L Ewalt, F U Hartl.   

Abstract

The cylindrical chaperonin GroEL of E. coli and its ring-shaped cofactor GroES cooperate in mediating the ATP-dependent folding of a wide range of polypeptides in vivo and in vitro. By binding to the ends of the GroEL cylinder, GroES displaces GroEL-bound polypeptide into an enclosed folding cage, thereby preventing protein aggregation during folding. The dynamic interaction of GroEL and GroES is regulated by the GroEL ATPase and involves the formation of asymmetrical GroEL:GroES1 and symmetrical GroEL: GroES2 complexes. The proposed role of the symmetrical complex as a catalytic intermediate of the chaperonin mechanism has been controversial. It has also been suggested that the formation of GroEL:GroES2 complexes allows the folding of two polypeptide molecules per GroEL reaction cycle, one in each ring of GroEL. By making use of a procedure to stabilize chaperonin complexes by rapid crosslinking for subsequent analysis by native PAGE, we have quantified the occurrence of GroEL:GroES1 and GroEL:GroES2 complexes in active refolding reactions under a variety of conditions using mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mMDH) as a substrate. Our results show that the symmetrical complexes are neither required for chaperonin function nor does their presence significantly increase the rate of mMDH refolding. In contrast, chaperonin-assisted folding is strictly dependent on the formation of asymmetrical GroEL:GroES1 complexes. These findings support the view that GroEL:GroES2 complexes have no essential role in the chaperonin mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10384959     DOI: 10.1515/BC.1999.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Chem        ISSN: 1431-6730            Impact factor:   3.915


  9 in total

1.  Asymmetry of the GroEL-GroES complex under physiological conditions as revealed by small-angle x-ray scattering.

Authors:  Tomonao Inobe; Kazunobu Takahashi; Kosuke Maki; Sawako Enoki; Kiyoto Kamagata; Akio Kadooka; Munehito Arai; Kunihiro Kuwajima
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes are the protein-folding functional form of the chaperonin nanomachine.

Authors:  Dong Yang; Xiang Ye; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Substrate protein switches GroE chaperonins from asymmetric to symmetric cycling by catalyzing nucleotide exchange.

Authors:  Xiang Ye; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant.

Authors:  Ayumi Koike-Takeshita; Masasuke Yoshida; Hideki Taguchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Probing open conformation of GroEL rings by cross-linking reveals single and double open ring structures of GroEL in ADP and ATP.

Authors:  Tatsuya Nojima; Masasuke Yoshida
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  The chaperone toolbox at the single-molecule level: From clamping to confining.

Authors:  Mario J Avellaneda; Eline J Koers; Mohsin M Naqvi; Sander J Tans
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Formation and structures of GroEL:GroES2 chaperonin footballs, the protein-folding functional form.

Authors:  Xue Fei; Xiang Ye; Nicole A LaRonde; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Chaperonin GroEL uses asymmetric and symmetric reaction cycles in response to the concentration of non-native substrate proteins.

Authors:  Ryo Iizuka; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  Biophys Physicobiol       Date:  2016-04-22

9.  Structural insight into the cooperation of chloroplast chaperonin subunits.

Authors:  Shijia Zhang; Huan Zhou; Feng Yu; Cuicui Bai; Qian Zhao; Jianhua He; Cuimin Liu
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 7.431

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.