Literature DB >> 29735734

Substrate protein dependence of GroEL-GroES interaction cycle revealed by high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging.

Daisuke Noshiro1,2, Toshio Ando3,2.   

Abstract

A double-ring-shaped tetradecameric GroEL complex assists proper protein folding in cooperation with the cochaperonin GroES. The dynamic GroEL-GroES interaction reflects the allosteric intra- and inter-ring communications and the chaperonin reaction. Therefore, revealing this dynamic interaction is essential to understanding the allosteric communications and the operation mechanism of GroEL. Nevertheless, how this interaction proceeds in the chaperonin cycle has long been controversial. Here, we directly image the dynamic GroEL-GroES interaction under conditions with and without foldable substrate protein using high-speed atomic force microscopy. Then, the imaging results obtained under these conditions and our previous results in the presence of unfoldable substrate are compared. The molecular movies reveal that the entire reaction pathway is highly complicated but basically identical irrespective of the substrate condition. A prominent (but moderate) difference is in the population distribution of intermediate species: symmetric GroEL : GroES2 and asymmetric GroEL : GroES1 complexes, and GroES-unbound GroEL. This difference is mainly attributed to the longer lifetime of GroEL : GroES1 complexes in the presence of foldable substrate. Moreover, the inter-ring communication, which is the basis for the alternating action of the two rings, occurs at two distinct (GroES association and dissociation) steps in the main reaction pathway, irrespective of the substrate condition.This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Allostery and molecular machines'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  GroEL; allostery; chaperonin; high-speed atomic force microscopy; imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29735734      PMCID: PMC5941175          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  46 in total

1.  Single-molecule study on the decay process of the football-shaped GroEL-GroES complex using zero-mode waveguides.

Authors:  Tomoya Sameshima; Ryo Iizuka; Taro Ueno; Junichi Wada; Mutsuko Aoki; Naonobu Shimamoto; Iwao Ohdomari; Takashi Tanii; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Video imaging of walking myosin V by high-speed atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Noriyuki Kodera; Daisuke Yamamoto; Ryoki Ishikawa; Toshio Ando
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Substrate protein switches GroE chaperonins from asymmetric to symmetric cycling by catalyzing nucleotide exchange.

Authors:  Xiang Ye; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Denatured proteins facilitate the formation of the football-shaped GroEL-(GroES)2 complex.

Authors:  Tomoya Sameshima; Ryo Iizuka; Taro Ueno; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 5.  Reaction Cycle of Chaperonin GroEL via Symmetric "Football" Intermediate.

Authors:  Hideki Taguchi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Crystal structure of a symmetric football-shaped GroEL:GroES2-ATP14 complex determined at 3.8Å reveals rearrangement between two GroEL rings.

Authors:  Ayumi Koike-Takeshita; Takatoshi Arakawa; Hideki Taguchi; Tatsuro Shimamura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES.

Authors:  J S Weissman; C M Hohl; O Kovalenko; Y Kashi; S Chen; K Braig; H R Saibil; W A Fenton; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-11-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The protein-folding activity of chaperonins correlates with the symmetric GroEL14(GroES7)2 heterooligomer.

Authors:  A Azem; S Diamant; M Kessel; C Weiss; P Goloubinoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex.

Authors:  M Mayhew; A C da Silva; J Martin; H Erdjument-Bromage; P Tempst; F U Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Engineering of novel tamavidin 2 muteins with lowered isoelectric points and lowered non-specific binding properties.

Authors:  Yoshimitsu Takakura; Naomi Oka; Hitomi Kajiwara; Masako Tsunashima
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reconciling the controversy regarding the functional importance of bullet- and football-shaped GroE complexes.

Authors:  Lavi S Bigman; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Allostery and molecular machines.

Authors:  George H Lorimer; Amnon Horovitz; Tom McLeish
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  BioAFMviewer: An interactive interface for simulated AFM scanning of biomolecular structures and dynamics.

Authors:  Romain Amyot; Holger Flechsig
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.