Literature DB >> 24164441

Concurrent validity of walking speed values calculated via the GAITRite electronic walkway and 3 meter walk test in the chronic stroke population.

Denise M Peters1, Addie Middleton, Jonathan W Donley, Erika L Blanck, Stacy L Fritz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide novel information regarding the concurrent validity (primary aim) and reliability (secondary aim) of walking speed (WS) calculated via the GAITRite electronic walkway system and 3 meter walk test (3MWT) in the chronic stroke population. The 3MWT is a feasible option for clinicians working in environments where space is limited. Psychometric properties of the test have not been established. Participants with chronic stroke were stratified into three groups: (1) household ambulators (HA) (self-selected WS < 0.4 m/s, 12 participants, 31 observations); (2) limited community ambulators (LCA) (self-selected WS 0.4-0.8 m/s, 24 participants, 60 observations); and (3) community ambulators (CA) (self-selected WS > 0.8 m/s, 26 participants, 71 observations). Three consecutive trials of GAITRite and 3MWT were performed at participant's self-selected WS. Average WS measurements differed significantly (p < 0.05) between GAITRite and 3MWT for all three groups. HA group: GAITRite 0.25 (0.11) m/s, 3MWT 0.27 (0.11) m/s; LCA group: GAITRite 0.56 (0.11) m/s, 3MWT 0.52 (0.10) m/s; CA group: GAITRite 1.03 (0.16) m/s, 3MWT 0.89 (0.15) m/s. Both WS measures had excellent within-session reliability (ICC's ranging from 0.85 to 0.97, SEM95 from 0.04 to 0.12 m/s and MDC95 from 0.05 to 0.16 m/s). Reliability was highest for HA on both measures. Although both the 3MWT and the GAITRite are reliable measures of WS for individuals with chronic stroke, the two measures do not demonstrate concurrent validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24164441      PMCID: PMC4251769          DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2013.845805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract        ISSN: 0959-3985            Impact factor:   2.279


  32 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Authors:  D E Beaton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Walking speed as a good predictor for the onset of functional dependence in a Japanese rural community population.

Authors:  S Shinkai; S Watanabe; S Kumagai; Y Fujiwara; H Amano; H Yoshida; T Ishizaki; H Yukawa; T Suzuki; H Shibata
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait.

Authors:  Belinda Bilney; Meg Morris; Kate Webster
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Reliability of the GAITRite walkway system for the quantification of temporo-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people.

Authors:  Hylton B Menz; Mark D Latt; Anne Tiedemann; Marcella Mun San Kwan; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke.

Authors:  John Green; Anne Forster; John Young
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.477

8.  Retest reliability of the temporal and distance characteristics of hemiplegic gait using a footswitch system.

Authors:  K D Hill; P A Goldie; P A Baker; K M Greenwood
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  P A Goldie; T A Matyas; O M Evans
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population.

Authors:  J Perry; M Garrett; J K Gronley; S J Mulroy
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  11 in total

1.  Walking test procedures influence speed measurements in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Brice T Cleland; Arianna Perez-Ortiz; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Balance impairment limits ability to increase walking speed in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Addie Middleton; Carty H Braun; Michael D Lewek; Stacy L Fritz
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-03-13       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Measuring Gait Parameters from Structural Vibrations.

Authors:  Benjamin T Davis; Brianna I Bryant; Stacy L Fritz; Reed Handlery; Alicia Flach; Victor A Hirth
Journal:  Measurement (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.131

Review 4.  Walking speed: the functional vital sign.

Authors:  Addie Middleton; Stacy L Fritz; Michelle Lusardi
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Concurrent validity of the GAITRite electronic walkway and the 10-m walk test for measurement of walking speed after stroke.

Authors:  Brice T Cleland; Haris Arshad; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Development, Validity, and Reliability of a Novel Walking Speed Measurement Device: the GaitBox.

Authors:  Leighanne M Jarvis; Matthew J Peterson; Kevin M Caves
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Distance-limited walk tests post-stroke: A systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Darren Kai-Young Cheng; Matthieu Dagenais; Kyla Alsbury-Nealy; Jean Michelle Legasto; Stephanie Scodras; Gayatri Aravind; Pam Takhar; Erica Nekolaichuk; Nancy Margaret Salbach
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Gait analysis with the Kinect v2: normative study with healthy individuals and comprehensive study of its sensitivity, validity, and reliability in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Jorge Latorre; Carolina Colomer; Mariano Alcañiz; Roberto Llorens
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Effect of testing procedures on gait speed measurement: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna K Stuck; Madeleine Bachmann; Pia Füllemann; Karen R Josephson; Andreas E Stuck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neuronal injury in the motor cortex after chronic stroke and lower limb motor impairment: a voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study.

Authors:  Alexandria M Reynolds; Denise M Peters; Jennifer M C Vendemia; Lenwood P Smith; Raymond C Sweet; Gordon C Baylis; Debra Krotish; Stacy L Fritz
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.