Literature DB >> 8857890

Deficit and change in gait velocity during rehabilitation after stroke.

P A Goldie1, T A Matyas, O M Evans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the initial deficit, change, and outcome in gait velocity during inpatient rehabilitation following stroke.
DESIGN: The initial deficit on admission to rehabilitation was quantified by comparing 42 stroke patients with 42 controls matched by gender and age. The change in the stroke patients during the next 8 weeks was quantified and gait outcome was compared with functional and normal criteria.
SETTING: Patients were referred from four inpatient rehabilitation centers at the time of admission following a median of 16.5 days in the acute hospital. SELECTION CRITERIA: ability to give informed consent; unilateral first stroke; ability to walk 10 meters. INTERVENTION: Patients participated in a median of 17.38 hours of individual physical therapy including a median of 6.92 hours of gait training during the 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Gait velocity.
RESULTS: Gait velocity was initially 38.6% (26.7m/min SD = 14.9) of the performance of controls and improved to 55.1% (38.1m/min). At outcome only 24% exceeded the 5th percentile of controls (48.1m/min) or the velocity required to cross the typical signalled intersection (46.2m/min). The change was only 26% of the initial deficit. Fifty-five percent of the patients improved beyond the 95% confidence intervals surrounding the error of measuring change. Indices of responsiveness indicated that there was a high signal-to-noise ratio and a robust effect size.
CONCLUSION: Gait velocity discriminated the effect of stroke and the change during rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8857890     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90072-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  44 in total

1.  Utilization of a 5-Meter Walk Test in Evaluating Self-selected Gait Speed during Preoperative Screening of Patients Scheduled for Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher M Wilson; Stephanie R Kostsuca; Judith A Boura
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2013-09

Review 2.  Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Sharon Barak; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

Review 3.  Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  James E Graham; Glenn V Ostir; Steven R Fisher; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 4.  Relationship between test methodology and mean velocity in timed walk tests: a review.

Authors:  James E Graham; Glenn V Ostir; Yong-Fang Kuo; Steven R Fisher; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 5.  A systematic review of mechanisms of gait speed change post-stroke. Part 2: exercise capacity, muscle activation, kinetics, and kinematics.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wonsetler; Mark G Bowden
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.119

6.  Prediction of discharge walking ability from initial assessment in a stroke inpatient rehabilitation facility population.

Authors:  Marghuretta D Bland; Audra Sturmoski; Michelle Whitson; Lisa Tabor Connor; Robert Fucetola; Thy Huskey; Maurizio Corbetta; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  Walking speed: the functional vital sign.

Authors:  Addie Middleton; Stacy L Fritz; Michelle Lusardi
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  The association between walking speed from short- and standard-distance tests with the risk of all-cause mortality among adults with radiographic knee osteoarthritis: data from three large United States cohort studies.

Authors:  H Master; T Neogi; L F Callahan; A E Nelson; M LaValley; R J Cleveland; Y M Golightly; L M Thoma; Y Zhang; D Voinier; M B Christiansen; J T Jakiela; M Nevitt; C E Lewis; L A Frey-Law; D K White
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Muscle contributions to support and progression over a range of walking speeds.

Authors:  May Q Liu; Frank C Anderson; Michael H Schwartz; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Outcome tools used for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: responsiveness and minimum clinically important differences.

Authors:  D Oeffinger; A Bagley; S Rogers; G Gorton; R Kryscio; M Abel; D Damiano; D Barnes; C Tylkowski
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.