OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of gait speed in late-stage stroke patients. DESIGN: Test-retest reliability of three timed walks to 10 metres repeated during two assessments one week apart. SETTING: The patient's home. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two stroke patients with mobility problems more than one year after stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Gait speed measured in seconds taken to walk 10 metres. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Intraclass correlations (ICCs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the Bland and Altman method for assessing agreement by calculating the mean difference between measurements (d); the 95% CI for d; the standard deviation of the difference (SDdiff); a reliability coefficient and the 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: There was a trend for decreased times taken to walk 10 metres both within each assessment and between assessments. ICCs for within-assessment reliability were 0.95-0.99. The d (SDdiff) for the second and third walks for assessment 1 was -1.00 (2.63) seconds and for assessment 2 was -0.70 (1.58) seconds. The reliability coefficient was 5.26 for assessment 1 and 3.17 for assessment 2. ICCs for between-assessment reliability were 0.87-0.88. The d (SDdiff) for the comparison of the third walks at assessment 1 and assessment 2 was -0.90 (5.01) seconds. The reliability coefficient was 10.02 and the 95% limits of agreement were -10.92 to +9.12 seconds. CONCLUSION: Within-assessment gait speed measured at home is highly reliable. The between-assessment reliability of gait speed measurement is less reliable but comparable with other studies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of gait speed in late-stage strokepatients. DESIGN: Test-retest reliability of three timed walks to 10 metres repeated during two assessments one week apart. SETTING: The patient's home. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two strokepatients with mobility problems more than one year after stroke. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Gait speed measured in seconds taken to walk 10 metres. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Intraclass correlations (ICCs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the Bland and Altman method for assessing agreement by calculating the mean difference between measurements (d); the 95% CI for d; the standard deviation of the difference (SDdiff); a reliability coefficient and the 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: There was a trend for decreased times taken to walk 10 metres both within each assessment and between assessments. ICCs for within-assessment reliability were 0.95-0.99. The d (SDdiff) for the second and third walks for assessment 1 was -1.00 (2.63) seconds and for assessment 2 was -0.70 (1.58) seconds. The reliability coefficient was 5.26 for assessment 1 and 3.17 for assessment 2. ICCs for between-assessment reliability were 0.87-0.88. The d (SDdiff) for the comparison of the third walks at assessment 1 and assessment 2 was -0.90 (5.01) seconds. The reliability coefficient was 10.02 and the 95% limits of agreement were -10.92 to +9.12 seconds. CONCLUSION: Within-assessment gait speed measured at home is highly reliable. The between-assessment reliability of gait speed measurement is less reliable but comparable with other studies.
Authors: James E Graham; Glenn V Ostir; Yong-Fang Kuo; Steven R Fisher; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Addie Middleton; Angela Merlo-Rains; Denise M Peters; Jennifaye V Greene; Erika L Blanck; Robert Moran; Stacy L Fritz Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Denise M Peters; Addie Middleton; Jonathan W Donley; Erika L Blanck; Stacy L Fritz Journal: Physiother Theory Pract Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Reed Handlery; Elizabeth W Regan; Jill C Stewart; Christine Pellegrini; Courtney Monroe; Garrett Hainline; Kaci Handlery; Stacy L Fritz Journal: Stroke Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 7.914