W Wesemann1. 1. , Grimmelshausenstr. 9, 50996, Köln, Deutschland. wfwesemann@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prevalence and magnitude of myopia among children and young adults wearing spectacles has increased in Germany from 2000 to 2015. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1,223,410 refraction values from 278,432 male and 333,273 female subjects between 5 and 30 years of age were analyzed. All subjects had received a new pair of spectacles between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015. The parameter studied was the spherical equivalent averaged over both eyes of each subject (N = 611,705). In order to identify temporal changes, the entire period of 16 years was divided into 4 time intervals of 4 years each. In the subjects three evaluation criteria were studied as a function of age: a) the frequency of myopic subjects among all spectacle wearers, b) the mean spherical equivalent and c) the distribution of the individual spherical equivalents. RESULTS: a) The frequency of myopic corrections among all spectacle wearers did not increase from 2000 to 2015. At 5 years of age, 9% of all children wearing glasses were myopic (≤-0.5 D) and 80% were hyperopic (≥+0.5 D). At the age of 10, 20 and 25 years, 46%, 75% and 79%, respectively, of all spectacle wearers were myopic and 42%, 13% and 10% hyperopic. b) The mean spherical equivalent, averaged across all spectacle wearers of the same age, did not show a myopic shift from 2000 to 2015. At the age of 5, 10.3 and 27 years, the mean spherical equivalent all subjects wearing glasses was +1.74 D, 0.0 D and -1.91D. c) The refractive power distribution of the individual spherical equivalents did not change significantly from 2000 to 2015. Neither low nor high myopias were more abundant in the period 2012-2015 compared to the previous years. CONCLUSION: The frequency and the refractive power of myopia did not increase in Germany over the last 16 years.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prevalence and magnitude of myopia among children and young adults wearing spectacles has increased in Germany from 2000 to 2015. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1,223,410 refraction values from 278,432 male and 333,273 female subjects between 5 and 30 years of age were analyzed. All subjects had received a new pair of spectacles between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015. The parameter studied was the spherical equivalent averaged over both eyes of each subject (N = 611,705). In order to identify temporal changes, the entire period of 16 years was divided into 4 time intervals of 4 years each. In the subjects three evaluation criteria were studied as a function of age: a) the frequency of myopic subjects among all spectacle wearers, b) the mean spherical equivalent and c) the distribution of the individual spherical equivalents. RESULTS: a) The frequency of myopic corrections among all spectacle wearers did not increase from 2000 to 2015. At 5 years of age, 9% of all children wearing glasses were myopic (≤-0.5 D) and 80% were hyperopic (≥+0.5 D). At the age of 10, 20 and 25 years, 46%, 75% and 79%, respectively, of all spectacle wearers were myopic and 42%, 13% and 10% hyperopic. b) The mean spherical equivalent, averaged across all spectacle wearers of the same age, did not show a myopic shift from 2000 to 2015. At the age of 5, 10.3 and 27 years, the mean spherical equivalent all subjects wearing glasses was +1.74 D, 0.0 D and -1.91D. c) The refractive power distribution of the individual spherical equivalents did not change significantly from 2000 to 2015. Neither low nor high myopias were more abundant in the period 2012-2015 compared to the previous years. CONCLUSION: The frequency and the refractive power of myopia did not increase in Germany over the last 16 years.
Entities:
Keywords:
Germany; Increase in myopia; Myopia; Prevalence of myopia; School myopia
Authors: Brien A Holden; Timothy R Fricke; David A Wilson; Monica Jong; Kovin S Naidoo; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Tien Y Wong; Thomas J Naduvilath; Serge Resnikoff Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Lisa A Jones; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Gladys L Mitchell; Melvin L Moeschberger; Karla Zadnik Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Katie M Williams; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Phillippa Cumberland; Geir Bertelsen; Christian Wolfram; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Johannes R Vingerling; Robert W A M Kuijpers; René Höhn; Alireza Mirshahi; Anthony P Khawaja; Robert N Luben; Maja Gran Erke; Therese von Hanno; Omar Mahroo; Ruth Hogg; Christian Gieger; Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire; Eleftherios Anastasopoulos; Alain Bron; Jean-François Dartigues; Jean-François Korobelnik; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher; Fotis Topouzis; Cécile Delcourt; Jugnoo Rahi; Thomas Meitinger; Astrid Fletcher; Paul J Foster; Norbert Pfeiffer; Caroline C W Klaver; Christopher J Hammond Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Alicja R Rudnicka; Venediktos V Kapetanakis; Andrea K Wathern; Nicola S Logan; Bernard Gilmartin; Peter H Whincup; Derek G Cook; Christopher G Owen Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Alexander K Schuster; Laura Krause; Clara Kuchenbäcker; Franziska Prütz; Heike M Elflein; Norbert Pfeiffer; Michael S Urschitz Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 5.594