Literature DB >> 27564515

Internal Astigmatism in Myopes and Non-myopes: Compensation or Constant?

Ruth E Manny1, Li Deng, Jane Gwiazda, Leslie Hyman, Erik Weissberg, Mitchell Scheiman, Karen D Fern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine internal astigmatism (IA) in myopes and non-myopes using a new method to assess compensation of corneal astigmatism (CA) by IA, to look for predictors of high IA in young adult myopes, and to determine if as CA changes IA changes to reduce refractive astigmatism (RA) in an active compensatory process in myopes.
METHODS: Right eye keratometry and cycloplegic autorefraction were measured annually over 14 years in 367 myopes and once in 204 non-myopes age- (mean 21.91 ± 1.47 years), gender-, and ethnicity-matched to myopes at year 12. CA and RA at the corneal plane were expressed as J0, J45. IA = RA - CA. Inverse power transformation provided cylinder power and axis of IA for the compensation factor (IA/CA). Analyses included (1) paired and unpaired t-tests (refractive data), (2) chi-square tests (distributions of compensation factor), (3) logistic regression analysis (predictors of high IA), and (4) linear mixed models (time effect on RA, CA, and IA).
RESULTS: The magnitude of IAJ0 varied by refractive error (myopes -0.25 ± 0.24 vs. non-myopes -0.32 ± 0.21, p < 0.001). Compensation of CA by IA was poorer in myopes than non-myopes (χ p < 0.001). When matched by CA, compensation remained poorer in myopes than non-myopes (χ all p ≤ 0.04). Within each refractive group, compensation was better when CA was low than high (χ p < 0.001). When CA was low in myopes, high IA (≥1.00D) was less likely (p = 0.01). Longitudinal follow-up of myopes found no evidence for an active compensatory role for IA as CA increased over time. There were differences in IAJ0 by ethnicity over time (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In myopic and non-myopic eyes with low amounts of CA, IA may reduce CA's contribution to RA, but IA is not a constant. However, there is no evidence for an active compensatory role for IA reducing CA in myopes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27564515      PMCID: PMC5003335          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  30 in total

1.  Origins of the keratometer and its evolving role in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Ron Gutmark; David L Guyton
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting anterior and non-anterior corneal astigmatism: comparative study.

Authors:  Lance Kugler; Ilan Cohen; Walid Haddad; Ming X Wang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  A modification of Javal's rule for the correction of astigmatism.

Authors:  J D KRATZ; W G WALTON
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1949-07

4.  Relationship of age, sex, and ethnicity with myopia progression and axial elongation in the correction of myopia evaluation trial.

Authors:  Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda; Mohamed Hussein; Thomas T Norton; Ying Wang; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Donald Everett
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07

5.  Choroidal Thickness Profiles in Myopic Eyes of Young Adults in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial Cohort.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Qinghua Zhang; Wei Hou; Thomas T Norton; Katherine Weise; Keri Dirkes; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  A study of the axis of orientation of residual astigmatism.

Authors:  M C Dunne; M E Elawad; D A Barnes
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1994-08

7.  Myopia stabilization and associated factors among participants in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Baseline refractive and ocular component measures of children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET).

Authors:  Jane Gwiazda; Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Leslie Hyman; Mohamed Hussein; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Accuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement.

Authors:  Jau-Der Ho; Ching-Yao Tsai; Shiow-Wen Liou
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Evaluation of internal refraction with the optical path difference scan.

Authors:  Orkun Muftuoglu; Uzeyir Erdem
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence and inconformity of refractive errors and ocular biometry of 3573 medical university freshman students for 4 consecutive years.

Authors:  Hui-Juan Gao; Hong-Mei Zhang; Wei-Yu Dang; Lin Liu; Yun Zhu; Qing He; Xin Wang; Yan-Hui Chen; Fei Gao; Qing-Xin Wang; Hua Rong; Shu-Ling Niu; Rui-Hua Wei
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Ocular residual and corneal astigmatism in a clinical population of high school students.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Luoru Liu; Chenglin Pan; Xiaoning Li; Lun Pan; Weizhong Lan; Zhikuan Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.