Literature DB >> 24154828

Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue.

Zhong Jun Mo1, Yan Bin Zhao, Li Zhen Wang, Yu Sun, Ming Zhang, Yu Bo Fan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Various design concepts have been adopted in cervical disc prostheses, including sliding articulation and standalone configuration. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the standalone U-shaped configuration on the cervical spine.
METHODS: Based on an intact finite element model of C3-C7, a standalone U-shaped implant (DCI) was installed at C5-C6 and compared with a sliding articulation design (Prodisc-C) and an anterior fusion system. The range of motion (ROM), adjacent intradiscal pressure (IDP) and capsular ligament strain were calculated under different spinal motions.
RESULTS: Compared to the intact configuration, the ROM at C5-C6 was reduced by 90% after fusion, but increased by 70% in the Prodisc-C model, while the maximum percentage change in the DCI model was 30% decrease. At the adjacent segments, up to 32% increase in ROM happened after fusion, while up to 34% decrease occurred in Prodisc-C model and 17% decrease in DCI model. The IDP increased by 11.6% after fusion, but decreased by 5.6 and 6.3% in the DCI and Prodisc-C model, respectively. The capsular ligament strain increased by 147% in Prodisc-C and by 13% in the DCI model. The DCI implant exhibited a high stress distribution.
CONCLUSIONS: Spinal fusion resulted in compensatory increase of ROM at the adjacent sites, thereby elevating the IDP. Prodisc-C resulted in hyper-mobility at the operative site that led to an increase of ligament force and strain. The U-shaped implant could maintain the spinal kinematics and impose minimum influence on the adjacent soft tissues, despite the standalone configuration encountering the disadvantages of high stress distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24154828      PMCID: PMC3940800          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3070-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments.

Authors:  N Yoganandan; S Kumaresan; F A Pintar
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant.

Authors:  Denis J DiAngelo; Kevin T Foley; Brian R Morrow; John S Schwab; Jung Song; John W German; Eve Blair
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Multidirectional flexibility analysis of cervical artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Bryan W Cunningham; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Anton E Dmitriev; Manabu Ito; Niabin Hu; Yasuo Shikinami; Paul C McAfee; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-02

4.  Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Finn; Darrel S Brodke; Michael Daubs; Alpesh Patel; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments.

Authors:  S P Moroney; A B Schultz; J A Miller; G B Andersson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  In vivo stress measurement can predict pain on discography.

Authors:  D S McNally; I M Shackleford; A E Goodship; R C Mulholland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Thomas Mosnier; Jérôme Jund; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-11

8.  Biomechanical effects of C2-C7 intersegmental stability due to laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral facetectomy.

Authors:  Ng Hong-Wan; Teo Ee-Chon; Zhang Qing-Hang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Rick C Sasso; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Cathy S Carlson; Jan Goffin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 10.  Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Matthew Robbins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  15 in total

1.  In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thorsten Book; Stephan Magdu; Dorothea Daentzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Dynamic cervical stabilization: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Guy Matgé; Peter Buddenberg; Marcus Eif; Holger Schenke; Joerg Herdmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of cervical disc replacement and fusion hybrid surgery with various geometry of ball-and-socket artificial disc.

Authors:  Yang Li; Guy R Fogel; Zhenhua Liao; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Hao-Cheng Xu; Bo Yin; Xin-Lei Xia; Xiao-Sheng Ma; Hong-Li Wang; Jun Yin; Ming-Hao Shao; Fei-Zhou Lyu; Jian-Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 5.  Hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Zhiwei Jia; Zhongjun Mo; Fan Ding; Qing He; Yubo Fan; Dike Ruan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Zhongjun Mo; Qi Li; Zhiwei Jia; Jiemeng Yang; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effect of pillow height on the biomechanics of the head-neck complex: investigation of the cranio-cervical pressure and cervical spine alignment.

Authors:  Sicong Ren; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Hui Yang; Yan Zhou; Jin Lin; Ming Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Li Zou; Xin Rong; Xi-Jiao Liu; Hao Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Jie Li; Jin Shang; Yue Zhou; Changqing Li; Huan Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical and radiographic outcome of dynamic cervical implant (DCI) arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease: a minimal five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lin-Nan Wang; Bo-Wen Hu; Lei Wang; Yue-Ming Song; Xi Yang; Li-Min Liu; Hao Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.