Literature DB >> 24149593

Familiarisation and reliability of sprint test indices during laboratory and field assessment.

James G Hopker1, Damian A Coleman, Jonathan D Wiles, Andrew Galbraith.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the reliability of sprint performance in both field and laboratory conditions. Twenty-one male (mean ± s: 19 ± 1 years, 1.79 ± 0.07 m, 77.6 ± 7.1 kg) and seventeen female team sport players (mean ± s: 21 ± 4 years, 1.68 ± 0. 07 m, 62.7 ± 4.7 kg) performed a maximal 20-metre sprint running test on eight separate occasions. Four trials were conducted on a non-motorised treadmill in the laboratory; the other four were conducted outdoors on a hard-court training surface with time recorded by single-beam photocells. Trials were conducted in random order with no familiarisation prior to testing. There was a significant difference between times recorded during outdoor field trials (OFT) and indoor laboratory trials (ILT) using a non-motorised treadmill (3.47 ± 0.53 vs. 6.06 ±1.17s; p < 0.001). The coefficient of variation (CV) for time was 2.55-4.22% for OFT and 5.1-7.2% for ILT. During ILT peak force (420.9 ± 87.7N), mean force (147.2 ± 24.7N), peak power (1376.8 ± 451.9W) and mean power (514.8 ± 164.4W), and were measured. The CV for all ILT variables was highest during trial 1-2 comparison. The CV (95% confidence interval) for the trial 3-4 comparison yielded: 9.4% (7.7-12. 1%), 7.9% (6.4-10.2%), 10.1% (8.2-13.1%) and 6.2% (5.1-8.0%) for PF, MF, PP and MP and respectively. The results indicate that reliable data can be derived for single maximal sprint measures, using fixed distance protocols. However, significant differences in time/speed over 20-m exist between field and laboratory conditions. This is primarily due to the frictional resistance in the non- motorised treadmill. Measures of force and power during ILT require at least 3 familiarisations to reduce variability in test scores. Key pointsReliable data can be derived from single maximal sprint measures in both indoor and outdoor environments using fixed distance protocols.There may be significant time differences to complete fixed distance trials between the two environments.Measures of mean force, peak force and peak power during indoor trials may require multiple trials to reduce variability in test scores.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-motorised treadmill; familiarisation; force; power; sprint running

Year:  2009        PMID: 24149593      PMCID: PMC3761528     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  17 in total

1.  Reliability of power output during intermittent high-intensity cycling.

Authors:  P V Capriotti; W M Sherman; D R Lamb
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Assessment of blood lactate: practical evaluation of the Biosen 5030 lactate analyzer.

Authors:  R C Davison; D Coleman; J Balmer; M Nunn; S Theakston; M Burrows; S Bird
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Reliability of power output measurements during repeated treadmill sprinting in rugby players.

Authors:  R J Tong; W Bell; G Ball; E M Winter
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Reliability of sprint test indices in well-trained cyclists.

Authors:  D A Coleman; J D Wiles; M Nunn; M F Smith
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 6.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Effect of training on the aerobic power and anaerobic performance of prepubertal girls.

Authors:  A M McManus; N Armstrong; C A Williams
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.299

8.  Effect of caffeine and ephedrine ingestion on anaerobic exercise performance.

Authors:  D G Bell; I Jacobs; K Ellerington
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  A laboratory running test: metabolic responses of sprint and endurance trained athletes.

Authors:  M E Cheetham; C Williams; H K Lakomy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  The effects of creatine supplementation on repeated upper- and lower-body Wingate performance.

Authors:  J M Green; J R McLester; J E Smith; E R Mansfield
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sport-specific motor fitness tests in water polo: reliability, validity and playing position differences.

Authors:  Ognjen Uljevic; Miodrag Spasic; Damir Sekulic
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  STATIC STRETCHING DOES NOT REDUCE VARIABILITY, JUMP AND SPEED PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Luís Manuel Pinto Lopes Rama
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04

Review 3.  Advances in Sprint Acceleration Profiling for Field-Based Team-Sport Athletes: Utility, Reliability, Validity and Limitations.

Authors:  Kim D Simperingham; John B Cronin; Angus Ross
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Reliability of the Woodway Curve(TM) Non-Motorized Treadmill for Assessing Anaerobic Performance.

Authors:  Adam M Gonzalez; Adam J Wells; Jay R Hoffman; Jeffrey R Stout; Maren S Fragala; Gerald T Mangine; William P McCormack; Jeremy R Townsend; Adam R Jajtner; Nadia S Emerson; Edward H Robinson Iv
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.