Literature DB >> 27104057

STATIC STRETCHING DOES NOT REDUCE VARIABILITY, JUMP AND SPEED PERFORMANCE.

Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira, Luís Manuel Pinto Lopes Rama1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stretching is often part of the warm-up routine prior to athletic participation; however, controversial evidence exists on the effects of stretching on countermovement jump (CMJ) and sprint performance. Additionally, analysis of variability between repeated tasks is useful for monitoring players, to analyze factors that could affect the performance, and to guide clinical decisions for training strategies.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether static stretching (SS) prior to CMJ and 20-meter (20-m) sprint would affect performance, and to investigate whether SS affects an athlete's ability to perform these tasks consistently.
METHODS: Twenty-two trained healthy athletes (23.2 ± 5.0 years) attended, randomly, two testing sessions, separated by 48 hours. At session one, all participants underwent 10 minutes of dynamic running warm-up followed by the experimental tasks (three CMJ and three 20-m sprint), whereas five minutes of stretching was added after the warm-up routine at session two. All participants performed the same experimental tasks in both sessions. The stretching protocol consisted of five stretching exercises for each lower limb.
RESULTS: The paired-samples t-test revealed no significant differences between the stretching protocol condition and no stretching condition for the 20-m sprint (t(21)=.920; p=.368) and CMJ (t(21)=.709; p=.486). There were no significant differences in trial-by-trial variability on 20-m sprint (t(21)=1.934; p=.067) and CMJ scores (t(21)=.793; p=.437) as result of SS.
CONCLUSION: The SS protocol did not modify jumping and running ability in trained healthy athletes. The SS prior to training or competition may not cause detrimental effects to athletic performance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Nonrandomized controlled trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Counter movement jump; sports performance; sprint; static stretching; variability.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27104057      PMCID: PMC4827370     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  49 in total

1.  Gender differences in active musculoskeletal stiffness. Part I. Quantification in controlled measurements of knee joint dynamics.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Sara E Wilson; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Effects of differing intensities of static stretching on jump performance.

Authors:  David G Behm; Armin Kibele
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The use of static stretching in warm-up for training and competition.

Authors:  Warren B Young
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.010

4.  Familiarisation and reliability of sprint test indices during laboratory and field assessment.

Authors:  James G Hopker; Damian A Coleman; Jonathan D Wiles; Andrew Galbraith
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Flexibility is not Related to Stretch-Induced Deficits in Force or Power.

Authors:  David G Behm; Erin E Bradbury; Allison T Haynes; Joanne N Hodder; Allison M Leonard; Natasha R Paddock
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Negative effect of static stretching restored when combined with a sport specific warm-up component.

Authors:  Kristie-Lee Taylor; Jeremy M Sheppard; Hamilton Lee; Norma Plummer
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.319

7.  Sources of Variability in Performance Times at the World Orienteering Championships.

Authors:  Kim Hébert-Losier; Simon Platt; William G Hopkins
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping.

Authors:  C Bosco; P Luhtanen; P V Komi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1983

9.  An investigation into the possible physiological mechanisms associated with changes in performance related to acute responses to different preactivity stretch modalities.

Authors:  Iain M Fletcher; Mathew M Monte-Colombo
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.665

10.  Effect of duration of passive stretch on hip abduction range of motion.

Authors:  S W Madding; J G Wong; A Hallum; J Medeiros
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of A Single Vibration Foam Rolling and Static Stretching Exercise on the Muscle Function and Mechanical Properties of the Hamstring Muscles.

Authors:  Marina Maren Reiner; Markus Tilp; Gaël Guilhem; Antonio Morales-Artacho; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.017

2.  Acute Effects of a Static Vs. a Dynamic Stretching Warm-up on Repeated-Sprint Performance in Female Handball Players.

Authors:  Piotr Zmijewski; Patrycja Lipinska; Anna Czajkowska; Anna Mróz; Paweł Kapuściński; Krzysztof Mazurek
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.193

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.