Literature DB >> 10378922

Reliability of power output during intermittent high-intensity cycling.

P V Capriotti1, W M Sherman, D R Lamb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the number of trials on consecutive days required to establish high reliability of an intermittent high-intensity cycling test in subjects unfamiliar with multiple-sprint exercise. We also examined the extent to which this reliability could be maintained for 6 d.
METHODS: Five untrained men performed a multiple-sprint test (10 x 7 s, with each sprint separated by 30 s) on each of four consecutive days (days 1-4), then rested for 6 d, and finally performed two additional tests on consecutive days (days 11 and 12). For statistical comparisons (analyses of variance), mean power outputs during sprints 8, 9, and 10 (MP8-10) on each test day were calculated for each of the 4th, 5th, and 6th seconds of the sprints, i.e., MP8-10(4th), MP8-10(5th), and MP8-10(6th). Peak power during each sprint was also examined.
RESULTS: For days 3 and 4, values for MP8-10(4th), MP8-10(5th), and MP8-10(6th) were greater than on day 1 (P < 0.05). MP8-10(6th) on day 2 was also greater than on day 1 (P < 0.05). There were no differences in MP8-10 among days 2, 3, 4, 11, and 12. Also, peak power on day 1 was lower (P < 0.05) than peak power for all other days, which were not different from one another. The coefficients of variation (CV) for MP8-10 on day 3 versus day 4 were 3.3%, 2.5%, and 2.9% for MP8-10(4th), MP8-10(5th), and MP8-10(6th), respectively. The CV for MP8-10(4th), MP8-10(5th), and MP8-10(6th) on days 4, 11, and 12 ranged from 2.1 to 3.9%, with an overall mean of 3.1%. The greatest CV for MP8-10 was 5.2% for MP8-10(6th) on days 2 versus 3 and 2 versus 4. The mean CV for peak power for all pairwise combinations of days 4, 11, and 12 was 2.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, satisfactory reliability of intermittent cycling tests is achieved after two familiarization sessions identical to the tests, and that reliability can be maintained for 6 d.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10378922     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199906000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  5 in total

1.  Reliability of a 5 x 6-s maximal cycling repeated-sprint test in trained female team-sport athletes.

Authors:  K McGawley; D Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Familiarisation and reliability of sprint test indices during laboratory and field assessment.

Authors:  James G Hopker; Damian A Coleman; Jonathan D Wiles; Andrew Galbraith
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review.

Authors:  Tarak Driss; Henry Vandewalle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Familiarization, reliability, and comparability of a 40-m maximal shuttle run test.

Authors:  Mark Glaister; Hanna Hauck; Corinne S Abraham; Kevin L Merry; Dean Beaver; Bernadette Woods; Gillian McInnes
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  The effect of combined supplementation of carbohydrates and creatine on anaerobic performance.

Authors:  A S Theodorou; G Paradisis; E Smpokos; A Chatzinikolaou; I Fatouros; Rfgj King; C B Cooke
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.806

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.