Literature DB >> 11069342

Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace.

C R Broadbent1, W B Maxwell, R Ferrie, D J Wilson, M Gawne-Cain, R Russell.   

Abstract

Anaesthetists' ability to identify correctly a marked lumbar interspace was assessed in 100 patients undergoing spinal magnetic resonance imaging scans. Using ink, one anaesthetist marked an interspace on the lower spine and attempted to identify its level with the patient in the sitting position. A second anaesthetist attempted to identify the level with the patient in the flexed lateral position. A marker capsule was taped over the ink mark and a routine scan performed. The actual level of markers ranged from one space below to four spaces above the level at which the anaesthetist believed it to be. The marker was one space higher than assumed in 51% of cases and was identified correctly in only 29%. Accuracy was unaffected by patient position (sitting or lateral), although it was impaired by obesity (p = 0.001) and positioning of the markers high on the lower back (p < 0.001). The spinal cord terminated below L(1) in 19% of patients. This, together with the risk of accidentally selecting a higher interspace than intended for intrathecal injection, implies that spinal cord trauma is more likely when higher interspaces are selected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11069342     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-4.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  46 in total

1.  The effect of injection speed on the spinal block characteristics of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in the elderly.

Authors:  Smita Prakash; Veena Bhartiya; Vedatrayee Pramanik; Jyoti Pahilajani; Anoop Raj Gogia; Rajvir Singh
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Determining spinal level using the inferior angle of the scapula as a reference landmark: a retrospective analysis of 50 radiographs.

Authors:  Michael T Haneline; Robert Cooperstein; Morgan D Young; Justin Ross
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2008-03

3.  Reliability of Tuffier's line evaluated on cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Gunther Windisch; Heimo Ulz; Georg Feigl
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Detection and visualization of dural pulsation for spine needle interventions.

Authors:  A Jonathan McLeod; John S H Baxter; Golafsoun Ameri; Sugantha Ganapathy; Terry M Peters; Elvis C S Chen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  [Peripheral nerve blocks of the lower extremities. Clinical and practical aspects].

Authors:  A W Reske; A P Reske; V Meier; M Wiegel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  A randomized controlled trial comparing haemodynamic stability in elderly patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia at L5, S1 versus spinal anaesthesia at L3, 4 at a tertiary African hospital.

Authors:  Vitalis Mung'ayi; Karen Mbaya; Thikra Sharif; Dorothy Kamya
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.927

7.  Percutaneous Access to the Subarachnoid Space-An Approach to the Patient With Difficult Body Habitus.

Authors:  Ivan Chaitowitz; Michael Letzing; Evan Finkelstein; Robert Quencer
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-05

8.  Validity of palpation of the C1 transverse process: comparison with a radiographic reference standard.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Morgan Young; Makani Lew
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-06

9.  Would adopting a revised landmark rule for the spinal level of the iliac crests improve the accuracy of lumbar level identification?

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Felisha Truong
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2019-04

10.  Comparison of two spinal needle types to achieve a unilateral spinal block.

Authors:  Kristiina Kuusniemi; Kari Leino; Kaarlo Lertola; Kalevi Pihlajamäki; Mikko Pitkänen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.