Literature DB >> 24137098

Comparison of metabolic gas analysis between a standard laboratory system and a portable device.

Leah C Stroud1, Alan H Feiveson, Robert Ploutz-Snyder, John K De Witt, Meghan E Everett, Michael L Gernhardt.   

Abstract

Year:  2009        PMID： 24137098      PMCID： PMC3763298     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN： 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system.

Authors:  J E McLaughlin; G A King; E T Howley; D R Bassett; B E Ainsworth
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Accuracy and reliability of the ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400 and MedGraphics VO2000 metabolic systems.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Amanda Antczak; Jonathan R Hudak; Diane M DellaValle; Jere D Haas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Validity of inspiratory and expiratory methods of measuring gas exchange with a computerized system.

Authors:  D R Bassett; E T Howley; D L Thompson; G A King; S J Strath; J E McLaughlin; B B Parr
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-07

5.  Lack of agreement between gas exchange variables measured by two metabolic systems.

Authors:  Djordje G Jakovljevic; David Nunan; Gay Donovan; Lynette D Hodges; Gavin R H Sandercock; David A Brodie
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Accuracy and reliability of a Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system.

Authors:  R Duffield; B Dawson; H C Pinnington; P Wong
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.319
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.