Literature DB >> 24137064

Effects of Motorized vs Non-Motorized Treadmill Training on Hamstring/Quadriceps Strength Ratios.

Kelly A Franks1, Lee E Brown, Jared W Coburn, Robert D Kersey, Martim Bottaro.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Previous literature suggests that muscular involvement and biomechanical changes elicit different responses between overground and treadmill training. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of training on two different treadmill designs on the conventional (CR; concentric only) and functional (FR; eccentric to concentric) hamstring and quadriceps strength ratios. Fifteen men and sixteen women were randomly divided into three groups: motorized (MT), non-motorized (NMT) or control (C). Subjects completed pre and post-test isokinetic concentric and eccentric quadriceps and hamstring testing of both legs. Subjects completed 4 weeks of training on their respective treadmills with mileage increasing ½ mile each week, beginning with 2 miles. The C group did not participate in any training. The CR revealed a significant two way interaction of group x time with MT increasing (pre: 0.80 ± 0.09 to post: 0.84 ± 0.09), NMT decreasing (pre: 0.76 ± 0.13 to post: 0.74 ± 0.10), and C showing no change (pre: 0.79 ± 0.10 to post: 0.79 ± 0.09. The FR revealed a significant two way interaction of speed x sex with the FR increasing as speeds increased for men (60 degrees.s(-1): 1.04 ± 0.11; 180 degrees.s(-1): 1.66 ± 0.27; 300 degrees.s(-1): 2.36 ± 0.45) and women (60 degrees.s(-1): 1.05 ± 0.16; 180 degrees.s(-1): 1.90 ± 0.26; 300 degrees.s(-1): 2.75 ± 0.47) but women increased greater relative to men. Training mode elicited a specific change in concentric hamstring and quadriceps strength resulting in specific changes to the CR; however, neither training mode had an effect on eccentric hamstrings nor the FR. Special attention should be given to the mode of endurance training when the goal is to alter the hamstring/quadriceps CR. KEY POINTS: Specificity of treadmill training had different effects on concentric strength.Specificity of treadmill training had little or no effect on eccentric strength.Conventional and functional strength ratios may give different results based on training mode.Four weeks is long enough for strength results to be apparent in untrained people.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concentric; conventional; eccentric; functional; running; walking

Year:  2012        PMID: 24137064      PMCID: PMC3737846     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  26 in total

1.  A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex.

Authors:  A G Schache; P D Blanch; D A Rath; T V Wrigley; R Starr; K L Bennell
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Comparison of angular lumbar spine and pelvis kinematics during treadmill and overground locomotion.

Authors:  L Vogt; K Pfeifer; W Banzer
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  A 10-week randomized trial comparing eccentric vs. concentric hamstring strength training in well-trained soccer players.

Authors:  Roald Mjølsnes; Arni Arnason; Tor Østhagen; Truls Raastad; Roald Bahr
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  A comparison of sprinting kinematics on two types of treadmill and over-ground.

Authors:  M McKenna; P E Riches
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Effect of hamstring-emphasized resistance training on hamstring:quadriceps strength ratios.

Authors:  William R Holcomb; Mack D Rubley; Heather J Lee; Mark A Guadagnoli
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Thigh muscle activity and anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.

Authors:  Z Dvir; G Eger; N Halperin; A Shklar
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  The use of the functional H:Q ratio to assess fatigue in soccer.

Authors:  A Delextrat; J Gregory; D Cohen
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Peak torque of quadriceps and hamstring muscles in basketball and soccer players of different divisions.

Authors:  A Zakas; K Mandroukas; E Vamvakoudis; K Christoulas; N Aggelopoulou
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Isokinetic hamstring/quadriceps strength ratio: influence from joint angular velocity, gravity correction and contraction mode.

Authors:  P Aagaard; E B Simonsen; M Trolle; J Bangsbo; K Klausen
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1995-08

10.  Dynamic control and conventional strength ratios of the quadriceps and hamstrings in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  C D Hole; G H Smit; J Hammond; A Kumar; J Saxton; T Cochrane
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities.

Authors:  Filipe A B Sousa; Fúlvia B Manchado-Gobatto; Natália de A Rodrigues; Gustavo G de Araujo; Claudio A Gobatto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Effects of an Elastic Hamstring Assistance Device During Downhill Running.

Authors:  Randy L Aldret; Brittany A Trahan; Greggory Davis; Brian Campbell; David M Bellar
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  Muscle activation pattern during self-propelled treadmill walking.

Authors:  Britt Kostraba; Yi-Ning Wu; Pei-Chun Kao; Caroline Stark; Sheng-Che Yen; Jinsook Roh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-08-07

4.  Virtual Reality Gait Training to Promote Balance and Gait Among Older People: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kyeongjin Lee
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-22

5.  Treadmill and Running Speed Effects on Acceleration Impacts: Curved Non-Motorized Treadmill vs. Conventional Motorized Treadmill.

Authors:  Alberto Encarnación-Martínez; Ignacio Catalá-Vilaplana; Rafael Berenguer-Vidal; Roberto Sanchis-Sanchis; Borja Ochoa-Puig; Pedro Pérez-Soriano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.