Literature DB >> 496719

Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat.

J Gardi, M Merzenich, C McKean.   

Abstract

The frequency-following response (FFR) is a short-latency scalp-recorded evoked potential elicited by the presentation of low-frequency acoustic stimuli. It is thought to be the result of the synchronous electrical activity in brain stemauditory nuclei to each wave in the acoustic signal. The present investigation constitutes an attempt to determine the generators of the FFR in the cat by analysis of the response and by section of brain stem auditory nuclei and tracts. Among the results were the following: (1) the cochlear nuclei contribute approximately 50% of the amplitude of the scalp-recordedFFR in the cat. (2) The cochlea also makes a significant contribution, accounting for an average of nearly 25% of the response amplitude. (3) The superior olivary nuclei (and/or the nuclei of the lateral lemnisci) account for about 20% of the response amplitude. (4) The contributions from the inferior colliculi (contrary to earlier studies) were found to be relatively insignificant. (5) As a consequence of the existence of multiple generators, the FFR ample area of hair cell excitation for each stimulus frequency involved in the mediation of the FFR, suggestion that scalp-recorded FFRs could be used to ascertain low-frequency hearingsensitivity in uncooperative human subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 496719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  18 in total

1.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

2.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency-following response among neonates with progressive moderate hyperbilirubinemia.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Jiong Hu; Vinod K Bhutani; Ronald J Wong; Mei-Ling Tong; Shuping Han; Nikolas H Blevins; Matthew B Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat.

Authors:  N A Shaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Frequency-dependence of early auditory evoked responses in the guinea pig.

Authors:  N Dum; U Schmidt; H von Wedel
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1982

6.  Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus.

Authors:  Jianwen Wendy Gu; Barbara S Herrmann; Robert A Levine; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-07

9.  Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window.

Authors:  Mathieu Forgues; Heather A Koehn; Askia K Dunnon; Stephen H Pulver; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.

Authors:  S B Smith; K Ichiba; D S Velenovsky; B Cone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.