Literature DB >> 30808536

An analytic approach to identifying the sources of the low-frequency round window cochlear response.

Aryn M Kamerer1, Mark E Chertoff2.   

Abstract

The cochlear mihemical">crophonic, traditionally thought of as an indication of electrical current flow through hair cells, in conjunction with suppressing high-pass noise or tones, is a promising method of assessing the health of outer hair cells at hemical">specific locations along the cochlear partition. We propose that the electrical potential recorded from the round window in gerbils in repan class="Chemical">hemical">sponse to low-frequency tones, which we call cochlear repan class="Chemical">hemical">sponse (<hemical">span class="Chemical">CR), contains significant responses from multiple cellular sources, which may expand its diagnostic purview. In this study, CR is measured in the gerbil and modeled to identify its contributing sources. CR was recorded via an electrode placed in the round window niche of sixteen Mongolian gerbils and elicited with a 45 Hz tone burst embedded in 18 high-pass filtered noise conditions to target responses from increasing regions along the cochlear partition. Possible sources were modeled using previously-published hair cell and auditory nerve response data, and then weighted and combined using linear regression to produce a model response that fits closely to the mean CR waveform. The significant contributing sources identified by the model are outer hair cells, inner hair cells, and the auditory nerve. We conclude that the low-frequency CR contains contributions from several cellular sources.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30808536      PMCID: PMC6416063          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  63 in total

1.  Brief report: the cochlear microphonic as an indication of outer hair cell function.

Authors:  R H Withnell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; L Robles; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Mechanoelectric transduction of adult inner hair cells.

Authors:  Shuping Jia; Peter Dallos; David Z Z He
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The low-frequency response of inner hair cells in the guinea pig cochlea: implications for fluid coupling and resonance of the stereocilia.

Authors:  R B Patuzzi; G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Masking of auditory brainstem responses in young and aged gerbils.

Authors:  F A Boettcher; J H Mills; J R Dubno; R A Schmiedt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Inner hair cell responses to the velocity of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig.

Authors:  A L Nuttall; M C Brown; R I Masta; M Lawrence
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-04-27       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The origin of the low-frequency microphonic in the first cochlear turn of guinea-pig.

Authors:  R B Patuzzi; G K Yates; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Membrane resistance in endolymphatic walls of the first turn of the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  B M Johnstone; J R Johnstone; I D Pugsley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking effects on ABR waves I and V in infants and adults.

Authors:  A J Klein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.