Literature DB >> 10790039

Excitotoxic effect of kainic acid on chicken otoacoustic emissions and cochlear potentials.

H Sun1, R J Salvi, D L Ding, D E Hashino, M Shero, X Y Zheng.   

Abstract

Kainic acid (KA) is a potent glutamate analog that can temporarily or permanently damage glutamatergic neurons. The purpose of the present study was to determine the short- and long-term effects of KA on chicken otoacoustic emissions and cochlear potentials. A chronic electrode was used to record the compound action potential (CAP), cochlear microphonic (CM), and the slow, positive neural potential (SPNP), a predominantly dc response. The CM, CAP, SPNP, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were recorded before and after infusing 10 microl of a low dose (KA-L, 0.3 mM) or high dose (KA-H, 5 mM) of KA into scala tympani. KA caused a rapid and large reduction in CAP and SPNP amplitude in both the KA-H and KA-L groups; however, the CM and DPOAEs were largely unchanged. The amplitude of the CAP and SPNP in the KA-L group began to recover around 1 week post-KA, but was approximately 50% below normal at 4 weeks post-KA. In contrast, the CAP and SPNP showed no signs of recovery in the KA-H group. The results suggest that KA has no effect on the CM and DPOAEs generated by the hair cells, but selectively damages the CAP generated by the cochlear ganglion neurons. The reduction in the avian SPNP suggests that the response originates in the cochlear afferent neurons, unlike the summating potential (SP) in mammals that is generated in hair cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10790039     DOI: 10.1121/1.428495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Effects of selective auditory-nerve damage on the behavioral audiogram and temporal integration in the budgerigar.

Authors:  Stephanie J Wong; Kristina S Abrams; Kassidy N Amburgey; Yingxuan Wang; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Ischemia-reperfusion injury of the cochlea: pharmacological strategies for cochlear protection and implications of glutamate and reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Keiji Tabuchi; Bungo Nishimura; Shuho Tanaka; Kentaro Hayashi; Yuki Hirose; Akira Hara
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.363

3.  Normal Tone-In-Noise Sensitivity in Trained Budgerigars despite Substantial Auditory-Nerve Injury: No Evidence of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window.

Authors:  Mathieu Forgues; Heather A Koehn; Askia K Dunnon; Stephen H Pulver; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Persistent Auditory Nerve Damage Following Kainic Acid Excitotoxicity in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

6.  Evoked cochlear potentials in the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Otto Gleich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  Effects of Kainic Acid-Induced Auditory Nerve Damage on Envelope-Following Responses in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  John L Wilson; Kristina S Abrams; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.