Literature DB >> 30943095

Hair cell and neural contributions to the cochlear summating potential.

Andrew K Pappa1, Kendall A Hutson1, William C Scott1, J David Wilson1, Kevin E Fox2, Maheer M Masood1, Christopher K Giardina1, Stephen H Pulver1, Gilberto D Grana1, Charles Askew3, Douglas C Fitzpatrick1.   

Abstract

The cochlear summating potential (SP) to a tone is a baseline shift that persists for the duration of the burst. It is often considered the most enigmatic of cochlear potentials because its magnitude and polarity vary across frequency and level and its origins are uncertain. In this study, we used pharmacology to isolate sources of the SP originating from the gerbil cochlea. Animals either had the full complement of outer and inner hair cells (OHCs and IHCs) and an intact auditory nerve or had systemic treatment with furosemide and kanamycin (FK) to remove the outer hair cells. Responses to tone bursts were recorded from the round window before and after the neurotoxin kainic acid (KA) was applied. IHC responses were then isolated from the post-KA responses in FK animals, neural responses were isolated from the subtraction of post-KA from pre-KA responses in NH animals, and OHC responses were isolated by subtraction of post-KA responses in FK animals from post-KA responses in normal hearing (NH) animals. All three sources contributed to the SP; OHCs with a negative polarity and IHCs and the auditory nerve with positive polarity. Thus the recorded SP in NH animals is a sum of contributions from different sources, contributing to the variety of magnitudes and polarities seen across frequency and intensity. When this information was applied to observations of the SP recorded from the round window in human cochlear implant subjects, a strong neural contribution to the SP was confirmed in humans as well as gerbils. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Of the various potentials produced by the cochlea, the summating potential (SP) is typically described as the most enigmatic. Using combinations of ototoxins and neurotoxins, we show contributions to the SP from the auditory nerve and from inner and outer hair cells, which differ in polarity and vary in size across frequency and level. This complexity of sources helps to explain the enigmatic nature of the SP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory nerve; cochlear implants; electrocochleography; inner hair cells; outer hair cells

Year:  2019        PMID: 30943095      PMCID: PMC6620691          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00006.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  79 in total

1.  Primary afferent and cochlear nucleus contributions to extracellular potentials during tone-bursts.

Authors:  Peter Sellick; Robert Patuzzi; Donald Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The origin of the 900 Hz spectral peak in spontaneous and sound-evoked round-window electrical activity.

Authors:  Catherine M McMahon; Robert B Patuzzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Differential expression of outer hair cell potassium currents in the isolated cochlea of the guinea-pig.

Authors:  F Mammano; J F Ashmore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Electrocochleography: a review of recording approaches, clinical applications, and new findings in adults and children.

Authors:  John A Ferraro
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Cochlear summating potentials. Descriptive aspects.

Authors:  P Dallos; Z G Schoeny; M A Cheatham
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1972

6.  Low-frequency characteristics of intracellularly recorded receptor potentials in guinea-pig cochlear hair cells.

Authors:  I J Russell; P M Sellick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Auditory nerve disease of both ears revealed by auditory brainstem responses, electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  K Kaga; M Nakamura; M Shinogami; T Tsuzuku; K Yamada; M Shindo
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1996

8.  The development and interpretation of the summating potential response.

Authors:  D Harvey; K P Steel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Electrocochleography for different electrode positions in guinea pig.

Authors:  G W van Deelen; G F Smoorenburg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Prestin-driven cochlear amplification is not limited by the outer hair cell membrane time constant.

Authors:  Stuart L Johnson; Maryline Beurg; Walter Marcotti; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  17 in total

1.  Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects.

Authors:  Kelsie J Grant; Anita M Mepani; Peizhe Wu; Kenneth E Hancock; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Manipulation of the Endocochlear Potential Reveals Two Distinct Types of Cochlear Nonlinearity.

Authors:  C Elliott Strimbu; Yi Wang; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Optimizing non-invasive functional markers for cochlear deafferentation based on electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Neural Contributions to the Cochlear Summating Potential: Spiking and Dendritic Components.

Authors:  Brendan T Lutz; Kendall A Hutson; Eleonora M C Trecca; Meredith Hamby; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-07

5.  The summating potential in human electrocochleography: Gaussian models and Fourier analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Bennett O'Brien; Rosamaria Santarelli; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in "Normal-Hearing" Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy?

Authors:  Anita M Mepani; Sarah A Kirk; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Light sheet microscopy of the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Kendall A Hutson; Stephen H Pulver; Pablo Ariel; Caroline Naso; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Residual Hair Cell Responses in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Complete Loss of Acoustic Hearing After Implantation.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Jeong-Seo Kim; Jacob J Oleson; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04

Review 9.  Electrocochleography in cochlear implantation: Development, applications, and future directions.

Authors:  Jason H Barnes; Linda X Yin; Aniket A Saoji; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 10.  Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorders: From Diagnosis to Treatment: Literature Review and Case Reports.

Authors:  Romolo Daniele De Siati; Flora Rosenzweig; Guillaume Gersdorff; Anaïs Gregoire; Philippe Rombaux; Naïma Deggouj
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.