PURPOSE: To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient-echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water-excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water-excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×10(4) mm(3) ) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC. CONCLUSION: Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under- or overestimating CV by each sequence.
PURPOSE: To determine reproducibility of the femoral condyle cartilage volume (CV) in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies using various 3D imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 21 subjects with osteoarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including four different sequences (sagittal 3D fat suppressed spoiled gradient-echo [SPGR] at 1.5 T, fat suppressed fast low angle shot [FLASH] at 3 T, water-excitation dual echo steady state [DESS] at 3 T, and water-excitation multiecho data image combination [MEDIC] at 3 T) were acquired at baseline and ∼1 year later. The CV measured using semiautomated segmentation software by three readers was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean of the interclass correlation coefficient between each reader from SPGR, FLASH, DESS, and MEDIC was 0.899, 0.948, 0.943, and 0.954, respectively. The mean CV (×10(4) mm(3) ) measured by each reader from SPGR/FLASH/DESS/MEDIC sequences was the following in this order: 1.34/1.52/1.50/1.35, 1.21/1.43/1.40/1.27, 1.22/1.37/1.36/1.22, and 1.17/1.36/1.35/1.21 by readers 1, 2, 3 (first analysis), and 3 (second analysis), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in CV between any readers in any sequences. The CV measured on FLASH and DESS tended to be greater than that on SPGR or MEDIC. CONCLUSION: Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of cartilage segmentation using semiautomated software was validated. Although there was no statistical significance, there was a tendency of under- or overestimating CV by each sequence.
Authors: Erin M Simon; Sharon McCaffery; Howard A Rowley; Nancy J Fischbein; Ann Shimikawa; Joan M O'Brien Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2003-06-11 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: A Hyhlik-Dürr; S Faber; R Burgkart; T Stammberger; K P Maag; K H Englmeier; M Reiser; F Eckstein Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2000 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jeffrey B Driban; Grace H Lo; Ji Yeon Lee; Robert J Ward; Eric Miller; Jincheng Pang; Lori Lyn Price; Timothy E McAlindon Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 2.362