The influence of the resolution and contrast on measuring the articular cartilage volume in magnetic resonance images.

The progression of OA in patients may be followed by measuring the volume of articular cartilage from MR images. We attempted to determine the reproducibility of volume measurements of articular cartilage made from magnetic resonance images of the knees and the dependence of the reproducibility on image resolution and contrast-to-noise. A fat-suppressed 3D technique was used to generate four image sets with different image resolution. Each patient was imaged twice to obtain image pairs at each resolution. To assess the dependence of reproducibility on noise we generated six image sets for each patient by adding noise to the original images and repeating the comparison. On each image set, the femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage were outlined by a combination of computer and manual methods, and the images were used to calculate the volume of each cartilage plate. Comparing the coefficient of variance between the volume measurements made from the two visits, the volume measurements made from images with the highest resolution (0.275 x 0.275 x 1.0 mm) had the highest reproducibility. The high resolution images of the tibia and femur had the least partial-volume averaging and, as a result, better defined the boundaries between cartilage and adjacent tissues. A different trend was evident for the patella. For studies of osteoarthritis therapies, we recommend using MR images with the highest possible in-plane spatial resolution to provide the most reproducible volume measurements of knee cartilage.