Literature DB >> 11052494

Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume.

F Cicuttini1, A Forbes, A Asbeutah, K Morris, S Stuckey.   

Abstract

Quantitation of articular cartilage by magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction has been validated and is likely to be a useful outcome measure in clinical trials of arthritis. The cost of magnetic resonance imaging is largely dependent on scanning time. The aim of this study was to compare a fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence magnetic resonance imaging scanning protocol, which takes 5 minutes and 44 seconds, with the standard, previously validated spoiled gradient-echo sequence protocol, which takes 11 minutes and 56 seconds, in the measurement of knee cartilage volume. Cartilage volumes calculated from the standard and fast magnetic resonance imaging sequences were similar. The median absolute percentage overestimation or underestimation of the cartilage volume with the fast sequence for 10 normal subjects was 2.5, 4.1, and 3.2% for patellar, femoral, and tibial cartilage, respectively. For eight subjects with osteoarthritis, the percentages were 4.3 and 3.9% for femoral and tibial cartilage, respectively. The fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence protocol had very high intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility in normal subjects and in those with osteoarthritis. Because the cost of magnetic resonance imaging scanning is largely determined by scan time, the faster scanning protocol means that the cost of estimates of knee cartilage volume can be significantly reduced, thus increasing the feasibility of this methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11052494     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100180410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  29 in total

1.  Advanced MRI of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Hillary J Braun; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  The effects of exercise on human articular cartilage.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Hudelmaier; R Putz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Therapeutic targets in osteoarthritis: from today to tomorrow with new imaging technology.

Authors:  J-P Pelletier; J Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Imaging osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging versus x-ray.

Authors:  Charles Peterfy; Manish Kothari
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: validation study by multireaders.

Authors:  Yasunari Fujinaga; Hiroshi Yoshioka; Toshinori Sakai; Yoko Sakai; Felipe Souza; Philipp Lang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Anita E Wluka; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 7.  MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  A new technique to evaluate the impact of running on knee cartilage deformation by region.

Authors:  Elora C Brenneman Wilson; Anthony A Gatti; Monica R Maly
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Users of oestrogen replacement therapy have more knee cartilage than non-users.

Authors:  A E Wluka; S R Davis; M Bailey; S L Stuckey; F M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Longitudinal in vivo reproducibility of cartilage volume and surface in osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  M H Brem; J Pauser; H Yoshioka; A Brenning; J Stratmann; F F Hennig; R Kikinis; J Duryea; C S Winalski; P Lang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.