Literature DB >> 24113904

[Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with magnetic hearing implants: overview and procedural management].

S Nospes1, W Mann, A Keilmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Every year in Germany approximately 3,500 patients receive a cochlear implant or other hearing implants with an implantable magnet. At the same time more and more patients are examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the indications and execution of this imaging modality a number of restrictions and safety measures have to be considered.
METHODS: This article is based on the restrictions of the manufacturers and a selective literature search in PubMed using the following keywords: MRI compatibility/MRI safety + cochlea implant/auditory brainstem implant/Bonebridge/Carina/Esteem/Otomag/Sophono alpha/Vibrand Soundbridge. We included all 20 publications of this search concerning the MRI compatibility of the hearing implants complemented by papers cited in the primary articles.
RESULTS: High electromagnetic field intensities as used in MRI can cause malfunction and dislocation of the implant or the magnet in the device. Older cochlear implants (CI) and the current CIs produced by Advanced bionics without explantation of the magnet, some CI models produced by the company Cochlear and the middle ear implants Carina®/Esteem® (older models) and Vibrant-Soundbridge® are not approved for MRI examinations. Other hearing prostheses are approved for 0.2 T, 1.0 T or 1.5 T MRI and in exceptional circumstances 3 T MRI. Recommendations of the manufacturers have to be followed, notably wearing a head bandage during the imaging procedure. The longitudinal axis of the patient's head has to be to positioned parallel to the main magnetic field of the scanner. The patient may not move the head laterally during the examination. Possible artefacts and the reduced validity of the results of skull MRI have to be considered when evaluating the indications for the examination.
CONCLUSION: For patients wearing hearing implants with an implantable magnet the indications for MRI in devices with MRI certification should be rigorously restricted. Possible defects/dislocation of the implants may occur and the quality of the skull MRI images is reduced. A close contact between the radiologist and the implanting team is required. Other diagnostic procedure options should be exhausted before employing MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24113904     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-013-2570-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  36 in total

Review 1.  Safety considerations in MR imaging.

Authors:  E Kanal; F G Shellock; L Talagala
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant.

Authors:  C Vincent; I Ruzza; F M Vaneecloo; F Dubrulle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Management strategy of vestibular schwannoma in neurofibromatosis type 2.

Authors:  Haitham Ahmad Odat; Enrico Piccirillo; Giuliano Sequino; Abdelkader Taibah; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  MR compatibility of Med EL cochlear implants: clinical testing at 1.0 T.

Authors:  S Youssefzadeh; W Baumgartner; R Dorffner; W Gstöttner; S Trattnig
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Cochlear implants and magnetic resonance scans: A case report and review.

Authors:  Stephen J Broomfield; Melville Da Cruz; William P R Gibson
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-01

Review 6.  Magnet resonance imaging safety of the Vibrant Soundbridge system: a review.

Authors:  Jan Hendrik Wagner; Arne Ernst; Ingo Todt
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sophie Deneuve; Nathalie Loundon; Nicolas Leboulanger; Isabelle Rouillon; Erea Noel Garabedian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  The clinical significance of preoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Il Joon Moon; Eun Yeon Kim; Ga-Young Park; Min Seok Jang; Ji Hye Kim; Jeehun Lee; Won-Ho Chung; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Analysis of fifty-six cochlear implant device failures.

Authors:  Jan Gosepath; Karl Lippert; Annerose Keilmann; Wolf J Mann
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 10.  Comprehensive management of bilateral acoustic neuromas. Current perspectives.

Authors:  R J Briggs; D E Brackmann; M E Baser; W E Hitselberger
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-12
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants.

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants. German version].

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-Speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives.

Authors:  D Beutner; W Delb; H Frenzel; U Hoppe; K B Hüttenbrink; R Mlynski; A Limberger; R Schönweiler; B Schwab; I Todt; M Walger; T Wesarg; T Zahnert; R Zeh
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives].

Authors:  D Beutner; W Delb; H Frenzel; U Hoppe; K B Hüttenbrink; R Mlynski; A Limberger; R Schönweiler; B Schwab; I Todt; M Walger; T Wesarg; T Zahnert; R Zeh
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Sophono Alpha System and subtotal petrosectomy with external auditory canal blind sac closure.

Authors:  Giuseppe Magliulo; Rosaria Turchetta; Giannicola Iannella; Riccardo Valperga di Masino; Riccardo Valpega di Masino; Marco de Vincentiis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  [MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets-an update : Overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; M A Brockmann; A Läßig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in designs of clinical trials for interventions that seek to restore bilateral and binaural hearing in adults with unilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss ('single-sided deafness').

Authors:  Roulla Katiri; Deborah A Hall; Catherine F Killan; Sandra Smith; Pattarawadee Prayuenyong; Pádraig T Kitterick
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Nina Standaert; Ronald Peeters; Christ Glorieux; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-01-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.