Literature DB >> 24102936

Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK-based, small-scale service evaluation.

Dawn-Marie Walker1, Raksha Pandya-Wood2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, research grant awarding bodies are regarding involvement at all stages of research, including prior to funding, as good practice. However, it is unclear how researchers should pay for this. Therefore, a pre-funding bursary scheme was designed. Up to £500 could be requested for involvement to develop a grant application for which user involvement is a key requisite for the funding body concerned. As the bursary scheme had run for 2 years, an evaluation was conducted to ascertain whether the scheme was effective for incorporating early involvement and in developing the grant proposal.
RESULTS: Twelve applications were made of which all were funded. The mean amount requested was £432.91; with the mean amount awarded £308.72. The involvement activities conducted all used qualitative methodology. Feedback regarding the bursaries was positive: enabling refinement of the research question and design; developing dialogue between the service users and the researchers; and helping with team building, with service users sometimes becoming co-applicants or members of the steering groups. The bursaries provided a learning opportunity – about involvement for the researchers and about research for the service users. The ultimate aim of the scheme was to enhance the research grant. Regarding this, the involvement paid for by the bursary meant that applicants could complete the involvement sections with in-depth information and clarity.
CONCLUSION: For a relatively small financial outlay, appropriate involvement was made possible at an important part of the research process which is usually neglected due to lack of funding. Recommendations for implementation made.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  award; grant; impact; involvement; research design

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24102936      PMCID: PMC5060900          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  12 in total

Review 1.  Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda.

Authors:  Jonathan Boote; Rosemary Telford; Cindy Cooper
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Consumer involvement in research projects: the activities of research funders.

Authors:  Máire O'Donnell; Vikki Entwistle
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Jo Brett; Carole Mockford; Rosemary Barber
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 4.  A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.

Authors:  Sandy R Oliver; Rebecca W Rees; Lorna Clarke-Jones; Ruairidh Milne; Ann R Oakley; John Gabbay; Ken Stein; Phyll Buchanan; Gill Gyte
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Rosemary Barber; Jonathan D Boote; Glenys D Parry; Cindy L Cooper; Philippa Yeeles; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Lay perspectives: advantages for health research.

Authors:  V A Entwistle; M J Renfrew; S Yearley; J Forrester; T Lamont
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-07

7.  Funding: Australia's grant system wastes time.

Authors:  Danielle L Herbert; Adrian G Barnett; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carole Mockford; Sophie Staniszewska; Frances Griffiths; Sandra Herron-Marx
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient?

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-20

10.  How can health service users contribute to the NHS research and development programme?

Authors:  S R Oliver
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-20
View more
  9 in total

1.  What Matters to Whom: Patient and Public Involvement in Research.

Authors:  Karen J Gibbins; Jamie O Lo
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.966

2.  From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials.

Authors:  Deborah Buck; Carrol Gamble; Louise Dudley; Jennifer Preston; Bec Hanley; Paula R Williamson; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evaluating public involvement in research design and grant development: Using a qualitative document analysis method to analyse an award scheme for researchers.

Authors:  Susan Baxter; Delia Muir; Louise Brereton; Christine Allmark; Rosemary Barber; Lydia Harris; Brian Hodges; Samaira Khan; Wendy Baird
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2016-04-01

4.  A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards.

Authors:  Raksha Pandya-Wood; Duncan S Barron; Jim Elliott
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2017-04-04

5.  Supported and valued? A survey of early career researchers' experiences and perceptions of youth and adult involvement in mental health, self-harm and suicide research.

Authors:  Ruth Wadman; A Jess Williams; Katherine Brown; Emma Nielsen
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2019-04-29

6.  Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study.

Authors:  D Snape; J Kirkham; N Britten; K Froggatt; F Gradinger; F Lobban; Jennie Popay; K Wyatt; Ann Jacoby
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation.

Authors:  Carrol Gamble; Louise Dudley; Alison Allam; Philip Bell; Heather Goodare; Bec Hanley; Jennifer Preston; Alison Walker; Paula Williamson; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme.

Authors:  Adele Horobin; George Brown; Fred Higton; Stevie Vanhegan; Andrew Wragg; Paula Wray; Dawn-Marie Walker
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2017-04-05

9.  Patient and Public Involvement in Sexual and Reproductive Health: Time to Properly Integrate Citizen's Input into Science.

Authors:  García-Martín M; Amezcua-Prieto C; H Al Wattar B; Jørgensen Js; Bueno-Cavanillas A; Khan Ks
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.