BACKGROUND: Increasingly, research grant awarding bodies are regarding involvement at all stages of research, including prior to funding, as good practice. However, it is unclear how researchers should pay for this. Therefore, a pre-funding bursary scheme was designed. Up to £500 could be requested for involvement to develop a grant application for which user involvement is a key requisite for the funding body concerned. As the bursary scheme had run for 2 years, an evaluation was conducted to ascertain whether the scheme was effective for incorporating early involvement and in developing the grant proposal. RESULTS: Twelve applications were made of which all were funded. The mean amount requested was £432.91; with the mean amount awarded £308.72. The involvement activities conducted all used qualitative methodology. Feedback regarding the bursaries was positive: enabling refinement of the research question and design; developing dialogue between the service users and the researchers; and helping with team building, with service users sometimes becoming co-applicants or members of the steering groups. The bursaries provided a learning opportunity – about involvement for the researchers and about research for the service users. The ultimate aim of the scheme was to enhance the research grant. Regarding this, the involvement paid for by the bursary meant that applicants could complete the involvement sections with in-depth information and clarity. CONCLUSION: For a relatively small financial outlay, appropriate involvement was made possible at an important part of the research process which is usually neglected due to lack of funding. Recommendations for implementation made.
BACKGROUND: Increasingly, research grant awarding bodies are regarding involvement at all stages of research, including prior to funding, as good practice. However, it is unclear how researchers should pay for this. Therefore, a pre-funding bursary scheme was designed. Up to £500 could be requested for involvement to develop a grant application for which user involvement is a key requisite for the funding body concerned. As the bursary scheme had run for 2 years, an evaluation was conducted to ascertain whether the scheme was effective for incorporating early involvement and in developing the grant proposal. RESULTS: Twelve applications were made of which all were funded. The mean amount requested was £432.91; with the mean amount awarded £308.72. The involvement activities conducted all used qualitative methodology. Feedback regarding the bursaries was positive: enabling refinement of the research question and design; developing dialogue between the service users and the researchers; and helping with team building, with service users sometimes becoming co-applicants or members of the steering groups. The bursaries provided a learning opportunity – about involvement for the researchers and about research for the service users. The ultimate aim of the scheme was to enhance the research grant. Regarding this, the involvement paid for by the bursary meant that applicants could complete the involvement sections with in-depth information and clarity. CONCLUSION: For a relatively small financial outlay, appropriate involvement was made possible at an important part of the research process which is usually neglected due to lack of funding. Recommendations for implementation made.
Authors: Sandy R Oliver; Rebecca W Rees; Lorna Clarke-Jones; Ruairidh Milne; Ann R Oakley; John Gabbay; Ken Stein; Phyll Buchanan; Gill Gyte Journal: Health Expect Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Rosemary Barber; Jonathan D Boote; Glenys D Parry; Cindy L Cooper; Philippa Yeeles; Sarah Cook Journal: Health Expect Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Carole Mockford; Sophie Staniszewska; Frances Griffiths; Sandra Herron-Marx Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Deborah Buck; Carrol Gamble; Louise Dudley; Jennifer Preston; Bec Hanley; Paula R Williamson; Bridget Young Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: D Snape; J Kirkham; N Britten; K Froggatt; F Gradinger; F Lobban; Jennie Popay; K Wyatt; Ann Jacoby Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Carrol Gamble; Louise Dudley; Alison Allam; Philip Bell; Heather Goodare; Bec Hanley; Jennifer Preston; Alison Walker; Paula Williamson; Bridget Young Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Adele Horobin; George Brown; Fred Higton; Stevie Vanhegan; Andrew Wragg; Paula Wray; Dawn-Marie Walker Journal: Res Involv Engagem Date: 2017-04-05
Authors: García-Martín M; Amezcua-Prieto C; H Al Wattar B; Jørgensen Js; Bueno-Cavanillas A; Khan Ks Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 3.390