Literature DB >> 12088893

Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda.

Jonathan Boote1, Rosemary Telford, Cindy Cooper.   

Abstract

The involvement of consumers in health research is now Department of Health policy within the UK. Despite the existence of policy directives, there is a dearth of knowledge on the effects of such involvement. This paper critically reviews the state of our knowledge on this issue, and maps out a research agenda with the aim of stimulating systematic, empirical inquiry into consumer involvement in health research. The paper discusses definitions of 'the consumer'; considers why consumer involvement is believed to be important to health research; traces the development of the policy; analyses the epistemological and methodological implications of the policy; discusses the various levels of consumer involvement in research; and outlines the objections to the policy that have been put forward by clinicians and researchers. Four questions were identified during the review as being in need of theoretical and empirical attention: (1) how can consumer involvement in health research be further conceptualised? (2) how and why does consumer involvement influence health research? (3) how can the influence of consumers in health research be measured and evaluated? and (4) what factors are associated with 'successful' consumer involvement in health research?

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12088893     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00214-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  161 in total

1.  'What difference does it make?' Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Steven Gillard; Rohan Borschmann; Kati Turner; Norman Goodrich-Purnell; Kathleen Lovell; Mary Chambers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Academic medicine: the evidence base.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-02

3.  Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research.

Authors:  David Wright; Claire Foster; Ziv Amir; Jim Elliott; Roger Wilson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  'But is it a question worth asking?' A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers' ideas being abandoned.

Authors:  Jonathan D Boote; Mary Dalgleish; Janet Freeman; Zena Jones; Marianne Miles; Helen Rodgers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Public involvement in setting a national research agenda: a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Sandy Oliver; David G Armes; Gill Gyte
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Framework for Advancing the Reporting of Patient Engagement in Rheumatology Research Projects.

Authors:  Clayon B Hamilton; Jenny C Leese; Alison M Hoens; Linda C Li
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  Antje Lindenmeyer; Hilary Hearnshaw; Jackie Sturt; Ralph Ormerod; Geoff Aitchison
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  A consumer network for haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Nicole Skoetz; Olaf Weingart; Andreas Engert
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Wise owls and professors: the role of older researchers in the review of the National Service Framework for Older People.

Authors:  Michelle Cornes; John Peardon; Jill Manthorpe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Facilitating comparative effectiveness research in cancer genomics: evaluating stakeholder perceptions of the engagement process.

Authors:  Patricia A Deverka; Danielle C Lavallee; Priyanka J Desai; Joanne Armstrong; Mark Gorman; Leah Hole-Curry; James O'Leary; B W Ruffner; John Watkins; David L Veenstra; Laurence H Baker; Joseph M Unger; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.