Literature DB >> 15212869

Consumer involvement in research projects: the activities of research funders.

Máire O'Donnell1, Vikki Entwistle.   

Abstract

This paper reports findings from a postal questionnaire survey and in-depth interviews with UK funders of health-related research that explored whether, why and how they promote consumer involvement in research projects. Many UK funders of health-related research are adopting a policy of promoting consumer involvement in research projects. Telephone interviews revealed they have several reasons for doing so, and that they vary in the ways they encourage and support researchers to involve consumers. For some, descriptions of consumer involvement in a research proposal are important for project funding decisions. They recognized a need for flexibility when assessing consumer involvement in different contexts. We suggest that funders should continue to work to clarify what they consider to be the parameters of acceptability in terms of consumer involvement and ensure that 'flexible' criteria are fairly applied. Researchers should be aware of particular funders' views when applying for project funding.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15212869     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  21 in total

1.  Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  Antje Lindenmeyer; Hilary Hearnshaw; Jackie Sturt; Ralph Ormerod; Geoff Aitchison
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK-based, small-scale service evaluation.

Authors:  Dawn-Marie Walker; Raksha Pandya-Wood
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Addressing Deficits and Injustices: The Potential Epistemic Contributions of Patients to Research.

Authors:  Katrina Hutchison; Wendy Rogers; Vikki A Entwistle
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2017-12

4.  Involving consumers successfully in NHS research: a national survey.

Authors:  Rosemary Barber; Jonathan D Boote; Cindy L Cooper
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research.

Authors:  Carla Saunders; Afaf Girgis
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-11-18

6.  Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research.

Authors:  Jill Thompson; Rosemary Barber; Paul R Ward; Jonathan D Boote; Cindy L Cooper; Christopher J Armitage; Georgina Jones
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Patient involvement in research programming and implementation: A responsive evaluation of the Dialogue Model for research agenda setting.

Authors:  Tineke A Abma; Carina A C M Pittens; Merel Visse; Janneke E Elberse; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  A framework for the evaluation of patient information leaflets.

Authors:  Mark Garner; Zhenye Ning; Jill Francis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Consumer input into research: the Australian Cancer Trials website.

Authors:  Rachel F Dear; Alexandra L Barratt; Sally Crossing; Phyllis N Butow; Susan Hanson; Martin Hn Tattersall
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2011-06-26

10.  Collaborating with consumer and community representatives in health and medical research in Australia: results from an evaluation.

Authors:  Janet M Payne; Heather A D'Antoine; Kathryn E France; Anne E McKenzie; Nadine Henley; Anne E Bartu; Elizabeth J Elliott; Carol Bower
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2011-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.