Literature DB >> 24101023

Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Takuji Kaburagi1, Hiroya Takeuchi, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Tai Omori, Soji Ozawa, Yuko Kitagawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We developed a hybrid of the prone and left lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) in 2009. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of applying this novel TE position.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients who underwent TE at our institution between 2005 and 2010. Altogether, 33 patients underwent TE in the left lateral decubitus position (LD-TE) from 2005 to 2008, and 45 underwent TE in the hybrid position (hybrid-TE) from 2009 to 2010. Radical lymphadenectomy along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves was performed in both groups. The thoracic duct was preserved in the LD-TE group and resected in the hybrid-TE group. In the LD-TE group, all thoracic procedures were performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position. In the hybrid-TE group, the upper mediastinal procedure was performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position, and procedures at the middle and lower mediastinum were performed with the patient in the prone position under CO2 pneumothorax.
RESULTS: Hybrid-TE was associated with increased operating time. The number of harvested mediastinal nodes and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio on postoperative day 1 were both greater in this position. Although vocal cord palsy was observed more frequently in the hybrid-TE group, there was no significant difference in the rate of other complications or in-hospital mortality between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel hybrid position is believed feasible for use during TE. We believe that this position facilitates a more radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy with minimal intraoperative pulmonary damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24101023     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2258-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. A series of 75 cases.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; M Ueno; Y Tanaka; K Fukuhara; Y Hashimoto; Y Fujiwara; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  S Leibman; B M Smithers; D C Gotley; I Martin; J Thomas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for stage I and II esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamamoto; Katsunobu Kawahara; Takafumi Maekawa; Takeshi Shiraishi; Takayuki Shirakusa
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Significance of thoracoscopy-assisted surgery with a minithoracotomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single surgeon.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Takashi Kosaka; Hidetaka A Ono; Takashi Oshima; Shoichi Fujii; Ryo Takagawa; Jun Kimura; Motohiko Tokuhisa; Yusuke Izumisawa; Hirochika Makino; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  K Kawahara; T Maekawa; K Okabayashi; T Hideshima; T Shiraishi; Y Yoshinaga; T Shirakusa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; H Udagawa; Y Kajiyama
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  20 in total

1.  Comparison of perioperative and oncological outcome of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in left decubitus position and in prone position for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shirou Kuwabara; Kazuaki Kobayashi; Akira Kubota; Ikuma Shioi; Kenji Yamaguchi; Norio Katayanagi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Analysis of the Effect of Early Versus Conventional Nasogastric Tube Removal on Postoperative Complications After Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Masato Hayashi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yoshiaki Shoji; Syuhei Mayanagi; Rieko Nakamura; Koichi Suda; Norihito Wada; Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Two-lung ventilation in the prone position: is it the standard anesthetic management for thoracoscopic esophagectomy?

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-04

4.  The Benefits of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Induction Therapy in Conversion to Curative Treatment for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Masashi Takeuchi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Shuhei Mayanagi; Kayo Yoshida; Tomoyuki Irino; Kazumasa Fukuda; Rieko Nakamura; Norihito Wada; Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy: experience, technique and cautions.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Guang-Jian Zhang; Qi-Fei Wu; Zhuo-Qi Jia; Shuo Li; Jun-Ke Fu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Determination of the optimal surgical procedure by identifying risk factors for pneumonia after transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Masato Hayashi; Hiroya Takeuchi; Rieko Nakamura; Koichi Suda; Norihito Wada; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.230

7.  A low surgical Apgar score is a predictor of anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy, but not a prognostic factor.

Authors:  Masato Hayashi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Shuhei Mayanagi; Rieko Nakamura; Koichi Suda; Norihito Wada; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.230

8.  Postoperative Pneumonia is Associated with Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Salvage Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Takeuchi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Shuhei Mayanagi; Kayo Yoshida; Kazumasa Fukuda; Rieko Nakamura; Koichi Suda; Norihito Wada; Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Mediastinal Adiposity Influences the Technical Difficulty of Thoracic Procedure in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Takanori Kurogochi; Yu Imamura; Koujiro Nishida; Shinji Mine
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Akihiko Okamura; Masayuki Watanabe; Shinji Mine; Koujiro Nishida; Yu Imamura; Takanori Kurogochi; Yuko Kitagawa; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.