Literature DB >> 21909843

Significance of thoracoscopy-assisted surgery with a minithoracotomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single surgeon.

Chikara Kunisaki1, Takashi Kosaka, Hidetaka A Ono, Takashi Oshima, Shoichi Fujii, Ryo Takagawa, Jun Kimura, Motohiko Tokuhisa, Yusuke Izumisawa, Hirochika Makino, Hirotoshi Akiyama, Itaru Endo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study evaluated the surgical learning curve and outcomes of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised a series of 92 patients with preoperatively diagnosed resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. Additionally, the surgical outcomes in 79 esophageal cancer patients receiving open esophagectomies were compared. All patients underwent thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy in the lateral decubitus position. The short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated, and the surgical learning curve was assessed.
RESULTS: The total operation time was 477.8 ± 102.2 min, the thoracoscopic time was 157.9 ± 61.3 min, the total blood loss was 554.4 ± 280.5 ml, and the number of retrieved lymph nodes was 34.3 ± 14.3. Postoperative morbidity was observed in 23 patients. After the surgeon's first 40 cases, the surgical technique and short-term outcomes were stable. The 5-year disease-specific survival was 66.6% and the 5-year overall survival was 64.6% in patients receiving R0 thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy. Comparison of 5-year disease-specific survival rate according to tumor-node-metastasis stage between patients receiving R0 thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy and conventional open esophagectomy showed that there were no significant differences in survival in any stage between the two groups. Loco-regional recurrence was observed in 6 patients, distant recurrence in seven, and combined recurrence in nine after R0 thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy. There was no significant difference in the pattern of recurrence between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer was technically feasible and oncologically satisfactory, according to the surgical learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909843     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1664-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  23 in total

1.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort.

Authors:  Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in esophageal cancer assert arguments for extended two-field transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Justin K Smit; Bareld B Pultrum; Hendrik M van Dullemen; Gooitzen M Van Dam; Henk Groen; John T M Plukker
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Geetanjali A Agarwal; Saurabh N Joshi; Neeraj V Rayate; Ravindra M Sathe; Anjali M Patil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Chang Young Lee; Jin-Gu Lee; Seok Jin Haam; In-Kyu Park; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  T Lerut; P Nafteux; J Moons; W Coosemans; G Decker; P De Leyn; D Van Raemdonck; N Ectors
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Extended esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

Review 8.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical Effect and Postoperative Pain of Laparo-Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Yun Han
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Takuji Kaburagi; Hiroya Takeuchi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Tai Omori; Soji Ozawa; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Chien-Sheng Huang; Yu-Chung Wu; Teh-Ying Chou; Wen-Hu Hsu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Siaw-Acheampong; S K Kamarajah; R Gujjuri; J R Bundred; P Singh; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.