Literature DB >> 12520585

A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation.

H Osugi1, M Takemura, M Higashino, N Takada, S Lee, H Kinoshita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A direct comparison of open operation and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for radical oesophagectomy has yet to be published.
METHODS: Medical records of 149 patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent oesophagectomy and three-field lymphadenectomy were reviewed. Seventy-seven patients had the thoracic procedure performed via a 5-cm minithoracotomy and four ports (VATS group); the others were operated on by conventional posterolateral thoracotomy (open group).
RESULTS: The mean number of retrieved mediastinal nodes, blood loss and morbidity were similar in the VATS and open groups (33.9 versus 32.8 nodes, 284 versus 310 g, and 32 versus 38 per cent respectively). The thoracic procedure took longer in patients having VATS than in the control group (227 versus 186 min; P = 0.031). Vital capacity reduction was less with VATS than in the open group (15 versus 22 per cent; P = 0.016). The 3- and 5-year survival rates were similar: 70 and 55 per cent respectively for VATS compared with 60 and 57 per cent for the open procedure.
CONCLUSION: VATS provides comparable results to open radical oesophagectomy, with less surgical trauma. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12520585     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  84 in total

1.  A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Daiko; Mitsuyo Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer with situs inversus totalis.

Authors:  Yasumichi Yagi; Yutaka Yoshimitsu; Tsutomu Maeda; Hiroshi Sakuma; Michio Watanabe; Masuo Nakai; Hiroshi Ueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy.

Authors:  Kazushi Miyata; Masahide Fukaya; Keita Itatsu; Tetsuya Abe; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Effects of neutrophil elastase inhibitor in patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Wang; Long-Qi Chen; Yong Yuan; Wen-Ping Wang; Zhong-Xi Niu; Yu-Shang Yang; Jie Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  One surgeon's learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence?

Authors:  Wei Guo; Ying-Bo Zou; Zheng Ma; Hui-Jun Niu; Yao-Guang Jiang; Yun-Ping Zhao; Tai-Qian Gong; Ru-Wen Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Hans F Fuchs; Cristina R Harnsberger; Ryan C Broderick; David C Chang; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Michael Bouvet; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Esophagectomy without mortality: what can surgeons do?

Authors:  Simon Law
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Retrospective study using the propensity score to clarify the oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shinsuke Takeno; Yoshiaki Takahashi; Toshihiko Moroga; Katsunobu Kawahara; Yuichi Yamashita; Megu Ohtaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.