Literature DB >> 24099854

Long-term changes in the material properties of brain tissue at the implant-tissue interface.

Arati Sridharan1, Subramaniam D Rajan, Jit Muthuswamy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Brain tissue undergoes dramatic molecular and cellular remodeling at the implant-tissue interface that evolves over a period of weeks after implantation. The biomechanical impact of such remodeling on the interface remains unknown. In this study, we aim to assess the changes in the mechanical properties of the brain-electrode interface after chronic implantation of a microelectrode. APPROACH: Microelectrodes were implanted in the rodent cortex at a depth of 1 mm for different durations-1 day (n = 4), 10-14 days (n = 4), 4 weeks (n = 4) and 6-8 weeks (n = 7). After the initial duration of implantation, the microelectrodes were moved an additional 1 mm downward at a constant speed of 10 µm s(-1). Forces experienced by the microelectrode were measured during movement and after termination of movement. The biomechanical properties of the interfacial brain tissue were assessed from measured force-displacement curves using two separate models-a two-parameter Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic model and a viscoelastic model with a second-order Prony series. MAIN
RESULTS: Estimated shear moduli using a second-order viscoelastic model increased from 0.5-2.6 kPa (day 1 of implantation) to 25.7-59.3 kPa (after 4 weeks of implantation) and subsequently decreased to 0.8-7.9 kPa after 6-8 weeks of implantation in 6 of the 7 animals. The estimated elastic modulus increased from 4.1-7.8 kPa on the day of implantation to 24-44.9 kPa after 4 weeks. The elastic modulus was estimated to be 6.8-33.3 kPa in 6 of the 7 animals after 6-8 weeks of implantation. The above estimates suggest that the brain tissue surrounding the microelectrode evolves from a stiff matrix with maximal shear and elastic modulus after 4 weeks of implantation into a composite of two different layers with different mechanical properties-a stiff compact inner layer surrounded by softer brain tissue that is biomechanically similar to brain tissue-during the first week of implantation. Tissue micromotion-induced stresses on the microelectrode constituted 12-55% of the steady-state stresses on the microelectrode on the day of implantation (n = 4), 2-21% of the steady-state stresses after 4 weeks of implantation (n = 4), and 4-10% of the steady-state stresses after 6-8 weeks of implantation (n = 7). SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding biomechanical behavior at the brain-microelectrode interface is necessary for the long-term success of implantable neuroprosthetics and microelectrode arrays. Such quantitative physical characterization of the dynamic changes in the electrode-tissue interface will (a) drive the design and development of more mechanically optimal, chronic brain implants, and (b) lead to new insights into key cellular and molecular events such as neuronal adhesion, migration and function in the immediate vicinity of the brain implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24099854      PMCID: PMC3888957          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  56 in total

1.  Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  J C Williams; R L Rennaker; D R Kipke
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Protoc       Date:  1999-12

2.  Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Miguel A L Nicolelis; Dragan Dimitrov; Jose M Carmena; Roy Crist; Gary Lehew; Jerald D Kralik; Steven P Wise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull.

Authors:  Roy Biran; Dave C Martin; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion.

Authors:  C S Bjornsson; S J Oh; Y A Al-Kofahi; Y J Lim; K L Smith; J N Turner; S De; B Roysam; W Shain; S J Kim
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Biomechanics of single cortical neurons.

Authors:  Kristin B Bernick; Thibault P Prevost; Subra Suresh; Simona Socrate
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures.

Authors:  Penelope C Georges; William J Miller; David F Meaney; Evelyn S Sawyer; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Changes to the viscoelastic properties of brain tissue after traumatic axonal injury.

Authors:  Mehdi Shafieian; Kurosh K Darvish; James R Stone
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory.

Authors:  K Miller; K Chinzei
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Nurit Gefen; Qiliang Zhu; Ramesh Raghupathi; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Strength characterization of silicon microprobes in neurophysiological tissues.

Authors:  K Najafi; J F Hetke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  35 in total

1.  Compliant intracortical implants reduce strains and strain rates in brain tissue in vivo.

Authors:  Arati Sridharan; Jessica K Nguyen; Jeffrey R Capadona; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  A PDMS-based optical waveguide for transcutaneous powering of microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

3.  Bioinspired neuron-like electronics.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Tao Zhou; Theodore J Zwang; Guosong Hong; Yunlong Zhao; Robert D Viveros; Tian-Ming Fu; Teng Gao; Charles M Lieber
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Polydimethylsiloxane-based optical waveguides for tetherless powering of floating microstimulators.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Mechanically-compliant intracortical implants reduce the neuroinflammatory response.

Authors:  Jessica K Nguyen; Daniel J Park; John L Skousen; Allison E Hess-Dunning; Dustin J Tyler; Stuart J Rowan; Christoph Weder; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Hybrid Electrical and Optical Neural Interfaces.

Authors:  Zeinab Ramezani; Kyung Jin Seo; Hui Fang
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.881

7.  Wireless optoelectronic photometers for monitoring neuronal dynamics in the deep brain.

Authors:  Luyao Lu; Philipp Gutruf; Li Xia; Dionnet L Bhatti; Xinying Wang; Abraham Vazquez-Guardado; Xin Ning; Xinru Shen; Tian Sang; Rongxue Ma; Grace Pakeltis; Gabriel Sobczak; Hao Zhang; Dong-Oh Seo; Mantian Xue; Lan Yin; Debashis Chanda; Xing Sheng; Michael R Bruchas; John A Rogers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Wireless, battery-free subdermally implantable photometry systems for chronic recording of neural dynamics.

Authors:  Alex Burton; Sofian N Obaid; Abraham Vázquez-Guardado; Matthew B Schmit; Tucker Stuart; Le Cai; Zhiyuan Chen; Irawati Kandela; Chad R Haney; Emily A Waters; Haijiang Cai; John A Rogers; Luyao Lu; Philipp Gutruf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mechanical failure modes of chronically implanted planar silicon-based neural probes for laminar recording.

Authors:  Takashi D Y Kozai; Kasey Catt; Xia Li; Zhannetta V Gugel; Valur T Olafsson; Alberto L Vazquez; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Autonomous control for mechanically stable navigation of microscale implants in brain tissue to record neural activity.

Authors:  Sindhu Anand; Swathy Sampath Kumar; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.838

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.