Literature DB >> 25125443

Mechanically-compliant intracortical implants reduce the neuroinflammatory response.

Jessica K Nguyen1, Daniel J Park, John L Skousen, Allison E Hess-Dunning, Dustin J Tyler, Stuart J Rowan, Christoph Weder, Jeffrey R Capadona.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms underlying intracortical microelectrode encapsulation and failure are not well understood. A leading hypothesis implicates the role of the mechanical mismatch between rigid implant materials and the much softer brain tissue. Previous work has established the benefits of compliant materials on reducing early neuroinflammatory events. However, recent studies established late onset of a disease-like neurodegenerative state. APPROACH: In this study, we implanted mechanically-adaptive materials, which are initially rigid but become compliant after implantation, to investigate the long-term chronic neuroinflammatory response to compliant intracortical microelectrodes. MAIN
RESULTS: Three days after implantation, during the acute healing phase of the response, the tissue response to the compliant implants was statistically similar to that of chemically matched stiff implants with much higher rigidity. However, at two, eight, and sixteen weeks post-implantation in the rat cortex, the compliant implants demonstrated a significantly reduced neuroinflammatory response when compared to stiff reference materials. Chronically implanted compliant materials also exhibited a more stable blood-brain barrier than the stiff reference materials. SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, the data show strikingly that mechanically-compliant intracortical implants can reduce the neuroinflammatory response in comparison to stiffer systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25125443      PMCID: PMC4175058          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/5/056014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  55 in total

1.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull.

Authors:  Roy Biran; Dave C Martin; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings.

Authors:  Matthew P Ward; Pooja Rajdev; Casey Ellison; Pedro P Irazoqui
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants.

Authors:  J N Turner; W Shain; D H Szarowski; M Andersen; S Martins; M Isaacson; H Craighead
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Stimuli-responsive mechanically adaptive polymer nanocomposites.

Authors:  Kadhiravan Shanmuganathan; Jeffrey R Capadona; Stuart J Rowan; Christoph Weder
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Biomechanical analysis of silicon microelectrode-induced strain in the brain.

Authors:  Hyunjung Lee; Ravi V Bellamkonda; Wei Sun; Marc E Levenston
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Long-term changes in the material properties of brain tissue at the implant-tissue interface.

Authors:  Arati Sridharan; Subramaniam D Rajan; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Chronic intracortical microelectrode arrays induce non-uniform, depth-related tissue responses.

Authors:  Andrew J Woolley; Himanshi A Desai; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Stab injury and device implantation within the brain results in inversely multiphasic neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses.

Authors:  Kelsey A Potter; Amy C Buck; Wade K Self; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Strain rate-dependent induction of reactive astrogliosis and cell death in three-dimensional neuronal-astrocytic co-cultures.

Authors:  D Kacy Cullen; Crystal M Simon; Michelle C LaPlaca
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Microglia-specific localisation of a novel calcium binding protein, Iba1.

Authors:  D Ito; Y Imai; K Ohsawa; K Nakajima; Y Fukuuchi; S Kohsaka
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  1998-06-01
View more
  77 in total

1.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Compliant intracortical implants reduce strains and strain rates in brain tissue in vivo.

Authors:  Arati Sridharan; Jessica K Nguyen; Jeffrey R Capadona; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Polymers: Secrets from the deep sea.

Authors:  Andrew R Scott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Flexible, multifunctional neural probe with liquid metal enabled, ultra-large tunable stiffness for deep-brain chemical sensing and agent delivery.

Authors:  Ximiao Wen; Bo Wang; Shan Huang; Tingyi Leo Liu; Meng-Shiue Lee; Pei-Shan Chung; Yu Ting Chow; I-Wen Huang; Harold G Monbouquette; Nigel T Maidment; Pei-Yu Chiou
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 10.618

6.  Rapidly-customizable, scalable 3D-printed wireless optogenetic probes for versatile applications in neuroscience.

Authors:  Juhyun Lee; Kyle E Parker; Chinatsu Kawakami; Jenny R Kim; Raza Qazi; Junwoo Yea; Shun Zhang; Choong Yeon Kim; John Bilbily; Jianliang Xiao; Kyung-In Jang; Jordan G McCall; Jae-Woong Jeong
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  FEF inactivation with improved optogenetic methods.

Authors:  Leah Acker; Erica N Pino; Edward S Boyden; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Miniaturized, Battery-Free Optofluidic Systems with Potential for Wireless Pharmacology and Optogenetics.

Authors:  Kyung Nim Noh; Sung Il Park; Raza Qazi; Zhanan Zou; Aaron D Mickle; Jose G Grajales-Reyes; Kyung-In Jang; Robert W Gereau; Jianliang Xiao; John A Rogers; Jae-Woong Jeong
Journal:  Small       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  Inhibition of the cluster of differentiation 14 innate immunity pathway with IAXO-101 improves chronic microelectrode performance.

Authors:  John K Hermann; Madhumitha Ravikumar; Andrew J Shoffstall; Evon S Ereifej; Kyle M Kovach; Jeremy Chang; Arielle Soffer; Chun Wong; Vishnupriya Srivastava; Patrick Smith; Grace Protasiewicz; Jingle Jiang; Stephen M Selkirk; Robert H Miller; Steven Sidik; Nicholas P Ziats; Dawn M Taylor; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Clinical neuroprosthetics: Today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Morgan B Lee; Daniel R Kramer; Terrance Peng; Michael F Barbaro; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.961

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.