PURPOSE: An open-source software system for planning magnetic resonance (MR)-guided laser-induced thermal therapy (MRgLITT) in brain is presented. The system was designed to provide a streamlined and operator-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) for simulating and visualizing potential outcomes of various treatment scenarios to aid in decisions on treatment approach or feasibility. METHODS: A portable software module was developed on the 3D Slicer platform, an open-source medical imaging and visualization framework. The module introduces an interactive GUI for investigating different laser positions and power settings as well as the influence of patient-specific tissue properties for quickly creating and evaluating custom treatment options. It also provides a common treatment planning interface for use by both open-source and commercial finite element solvers. In this study, an open-source finite element solver for Pennes' bioheat equation is interfaced to the module to provide rapid 3D estimates of the steady-state temperature distribution and potential tissue damage in the presence of patient-specific tissue boundary conditions identified on segmented MR images. RESULTS: The total time to initialize and simulate an MRgLITT procedure using the GUI was [Formula: see text]5 min. Each independent simulation took [Formula: see text]30 s, including the time to visualize the results fused with the planning MRI. For demonstration purposes, a simulated steady-state isotherm contour [Formula: see text] was correlated with MR temperature imaging (N = 5). The mean Hausdorff distance between simulated and actual contours was 2.0 mm [Formula: see text], whereas the mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.93 [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSIONS: We have designed, implemented, and conducted initial feasibility evaluations of a software tool for intuitive and rapid planning of MRgLITT in brain. The retrospective in vivo dataset presented herein illustrates the feasibility and potential of incorporating fast, image-based bioheat predictions into an interactive virtual planning environment for such procedures.
PURPOSE: An open-source software system for planning magnetic resonance (MR)-guided laser-induced thermal therapy (MRgLITT) in brain is presented. The system was designed to provide a streamlined and operator-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) for simulating and visualizing potential outcomes of various treatment scenarios to aid in decisions on treatment approach or feasibility. METHODS: A portable software module was developed on the 3D Slicer platform, an open-source medical imaging and visualization framework. The module introduces an interactive GUI for investigating different laser positions and power settings as well as the influence of patient-specific tissue properties for quickly creating and evaluating custom treatment options. It also provides a common treatment planning interface for use by both open-source and commercial finite element solvers. In this study, an open-source finite element solver for Pennes' bioheat equation is interfaced to the module to provide rapid 3D estimates of the steady-state temperature distribution and potential tissue damage in the presence of patient-specific tissue boundary conditions identified on segmented MR images. RESULTS: The total time to initialize and simulate an MRgLITT procedure using the GUI was [Formula: see text]5 min. Each independent simulation took [Formula: see text]30 s, including the time to visualize the results fused with the planning MRI. For demonstration purposes, a simulated steady-state isotherm contour [Formula: see text] was correlated with MR temperature imaging (N = 5). The mean Hausdorff distance between simulated and actual contours was 2.0 mm [Formula: see text], whereas the mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.93 [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSIONS: We have designed, implemented, and conducted initial feasibility evaluations of a software tool for intuitive and rapid planning of MRgLITT in brain. The retrospective in vivo dataset presented herein illustrates the feasibility and potential of incorporating fast, image-based bioheat predictions into an interactive virtual planning environment for such procedures.
Authors: Nathan McDannold; Clare M Tempany; Fiona M Fennessy; Minna J So; Frank J Rybicki; Elizabeth A Stewart; Ferenc A Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alexandre Carpentier; Roger J McNichols; R Jason Stafford; Jean-Pierre Guichard; Daniel Reizine; Suzette Delaloge; Eric Vicaut; Didier Payen; Ashok Gowda; Bernard George Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Marcos B Paiva; Michael Bublik; Dan J Castro; Matthew Udewitz; Marilene B Wang; Luis Paulo Kowalski; Joel Sercarz Journal: Photomed Laser Surg Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Rohan C Vijayan; Reid C Thompson; Lola B Chambless; Peter J Morone; Le He; Logan W Clements; Rebekah H Griesenauer; Hakmook Kang; Michael I Miga Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-03-02
Authors: Samuel J Fahrenholtz; Tim Y Moon; Michael Franco; David Medina; Shabbar Danish; Ashok Gowda; Anil Shetty; Florian Maier; John D Hazle; Roger J Stafford; Tim Warburton; David Fuentes Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Walter J Jermakowicz; Iahn Cajigas; Lia Dan; Santiago Guerra; Samir Sur; Pierre-Francois D'Haese; Andres M Kanner; Jonathan R Jagid Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 3.240